Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Manolis Skoulikas great_worm@*****.com
Subject: A Van that is also a Boat that is also a Submarine...
Date: Sun, 04 Jun 2000 10:41:59 +0300
Alfredo B Alves wrote:
> But couldn't the other vehicle do the same?
>
> Yes, but not an enemy missile :P~
>

I think the ECCM test is made by the vehicle, not the missile.

> > In any case, you would get 3 successes an dthe other guy would get
> > 4,5.
> > Still no go IMO.
>
> On average yes, with a top of the line missile. That doesn't mean all
> hope is loss ... Missiles don't have karma pool ;) On average with one
> reroll, it goes from 3 vrs 4.5 to 5.5 vrs 4.5. :P~
>

I alwyas give the other guys rerolls equal to their professional rating.
So in a relatively competitive game, you stand tol lose your life or
alot of your day's rerolls! :)
I go for the rerolls all the time.:)

> Now, I'd say that the "average" missile will be Int 4 or 5. In which
> case, with ECM 4, you're on even ground with the missile.
>

To counter 1 or two successes (assuming Sig 4 or 5). Maybe it's not
worth the money.

> What you need to to beware of is the guided missile (as opposed to fir
> and forget). Those buggers, I believe, use the vehivles sensors instead
> of their own ... 18 dice? Ha! APC with milspec gear's probably got 12
> dice of sensors, 12 of ECCM to negate your ECM, and 13 dice to divide
> between sensors and ECCM. (Maybe 18 Sensor plus 19 ECCM? You might want
> to get a head start on kissing your ass goodbye ;) )
>

OK!Opposite to what people around here may think I am not that nasty!
Most of the time.... :)

> However, that's the MILITARY. You shouldn't be facing the military. Most
> likely, you'll be facing no worse than top of the line security grade
> forces (even if they call themselves a military). I can't think of many
> world powers from the Caribbean. ;)
>
Aztlan
Gunderson
Corp sponsored pirates
CAS/Ares covert ops

need I go on? :)

the wiz

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.