Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: dbuehrer@******.carl.org dbuehrer@******.carl.org
Subject: complimentary dice house rule
Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2000 12:24:58 -0600
Sebastian Wiers wrote:


>From: dbuehrer@******.carl.org <dbuehrer@******.carl.org>
>
>:My house rule regarding complimentary skills is to replace the two-to-one
>:success mechanic by dividing the complimentary skill by two and rounding
>:down to determine the number of additional dice. Pretty much the same
>:outcome, just a different way of approaching it.
>
>
> That really isn't quite the same. Take a TN of 6. With a
>(complementary) skill of 4, your chance of getting (at least) 2 successes is
>22%. Your chance of getting 4 is less than 1%. If you roll 2 dice, your
>chance of at least on six is 30%, and you get 2 almost 3% of the time.
>Complmentary dice are more effective with your method.
> There is also maybe the bigger difference that you must get at least one
>success with normal skill dice for complimentary successes to count at all.
>You could use diffrent colord dice for the (halved) complimentary skill, you
>didn't say, but adding them right into the roll without removing this
>restriction makes them MUCH more effective.

Eep! Okay, I'm not a statistician, and didn't realize what a difference it
was. Also, I completely missed the bit in the rules that the normal skill
dice needed to succeed before the complimentary dice would take effect.

Thanks for pointing that out Mongooose <starts editing his house rules>.

To Life,
-Graht
http://www.users.uswest.net/~abaker3
--
"My assistant, Bob the dinasaur, will now demonstrate
how to give a cat a 'fur wedgie.'"

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.