Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Marc Renouf renouf@********.com
Subject: CC Martial Arts
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2000 15:37:31 -0400 (EDT)
On Tue, 6 Jun 2000 dbuehrer@******.carl.org wrote:

> Which attribute is a reflection of weight then?

None of them. Which attribute should reflect eye color? It's a
pan-cultural phenomenon that people with green eyes are considered "more
attractive" than those without, all other things being equal (and I've
seen the test photos - *all* other facial features are equal). Does this
mean that people with a Charisma of 6 have green eyes?
Certainly not, and to suggest such a thing is silly. Just like
suggesting that weight is tied exclusively to the Body attribute is
ridiculous. Like I said, weight has absolutely no bearing on how well you
resist disease or how long you can hold your breath, or how likely a
mortal wound is to kill you in the next 3 to 18 seconds.
Weight, like hair-color, eye-color, general demeanor, and overall
attitude is something that I let players just pick. Most of them look at
their Physical attributes and say, "well, I have a high Quickness and
Strength, but a low Body, so I'm built for hard, fast work with little
endurance. As such, I probably have something like a bulk-muscle
physique. I'm a ripped little fireplug of a guy." But going off your
one-attribute model, they'd be a skinny person, as low Body would imply
low weight.
But if someone wants to be different? Go for it. "I'm
not fat, I'm 'big-boned'," as the saying goes.

> > As such, it seems kind of silly to just make the flat statement
> >that Body should be the sole determining factor in determining the power
> >level of an unarmed attack.
>
> What would you suggest? :)

How 'bout Strength. ;)

> > Further, an
> >excellent argument could be made that combat is a test of wills that's
> >over before the first punch is thrown, so all attacks should be made using
> >your Willpower rather than skill.
> > See what I'm getting at?
>
> Yes, you're making pointless arguments rather than addressing the issue
> that I've placed on the table :)

No, I've already addressed it, and am giving anecdotal evidence to
show why I disagree with your assertion.

Marc

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.