Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Rand Ratinac docwagon101@*****.com
Subject: BO (was Re: Now THAT'S a good question...)
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2000 20:10:52 -0700 (PDT)
> << Night Ones all have this flaw. Unless they bathe
at least twice a day, their fur acquires a musty odor,
which gives them a +1 target number. After strenuous
exercise (combat, running for more than half their
athletics skill in minutes, minimum one minute etc.)
they suffer a +2 modifier due to sweating. >>
>
> I would not think so....
>
> Line of reasoning... I know some incredibly furry
Men (my brother for example) whom manage to smell
really good. (I walk by and he smells of really nice
cologne.) Bathing impaired is bathing impaired
regardless of fur. Besides for most of us normal
humans, especially those of us in the Subtropics or
tropics tend to bathe more than once a day; as winter
is a one day season and heat (not Summer) is a 9 1/2
month season. You work out - you bathe. You do any
work outside - you bathe Get the point????!!!!
> Tinne

Hey, I've been to Singapore - I know how it goes. :)

1. Being hairy (even very hairy) is quite different to
having a coat of fur ALL OVER YOUR BODY.

2. The rule I suggested takes frequent bathing into
account. Night Ones only suffer from the flaw if they
don't bathe often enough. A bath after the strenuous
exercise will eliminate the penalty.

3. God, how serious do you think I am??? :) I'm
suggesting a flaw to do with BODY ODOUR. ;) If anyone
wants to use it, go ahead - I'm not going to. :)

*Doc' splashes a bit of "Eau de Noc One" under the old
armpits..."That'll keep those pesky flies away...no, wait..."*

====Doc'
(aka Mr. Freaky Big, Super-Dynamic Troll of Tomorrow, aka Doc'booner, aka Doc' Vader)

S.S. f. P.S.C. & D.J.

.sig Sauer

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Photos -- now, 100 FREE prints!
http://photos.yahoo.com

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.