Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Simon and Fiona sfuller@******.com.au
Subject: Clone question
Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2000 10:46:16 +1000
-----Original Message-----
From: Herc <airwisp@******************.com>
To: shadowrn@*********.com <shadowrn@*********.com>
Date: Thursday, June 08, 2000 11:45 PM
Subject: Re: Clone question


>> >From: <acjpenn@******.com>
>> >Not exact enough. What if I hate someone so much that I'm willing to go
>> >out on a limb for the irony? How funny would it be to face off against
>> >this person, only to have this person realize he's fighting himself? (at
>> >least a clone) What if I've always wanted to be with some supermodel and
>> >I've hunted till I've found her docwagon clone?
>> >Spirits materializing are one thing, but what about an EXACT copy of a
>> >person?
>>
>> *Ponders*
>>
>> I doesn't actually say in MITS that there is any limits on the form an
>ally
>> can take; I therefore use the same ruling as for Illusion spells;
anything
>> the [summoner] has seen can be created (in apperance at least).
>>
>> Phil
>
>-OR- anything that the mage has taken the time to draw and think out on
>their own.
>
(going OT yet again...sorry)
I saw two interesting Clone stroies in old issues of New Scientist yesterday
when I should have been working. First of all, a news report on Dolly the
Sheep. "Dolly is unique..." Think about it :?)
Second, an interview on some Brit radio station about cloning Mammoths and
such. (not exact quote)
Interviewer: "So could you breed an Elephant and a Mammoth together?"
Boffin "Yes, the result would be like breeding a horse and a donkey
together, you'd get a sort of non-viable mule"
Int:"So you'd get a big hairy gorrilla?"
Boffin "...Well, yes, but it would have tusks and be elephant shaped."

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.