Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Alfredo B Alves dghost@****.com
Subject: A different take on "Slaughter Enemies".
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2000 02:19:31 -0500
On Fri, 16 Jun 2000 17:59:51 +1200 (NZST) Keith Duthie
<psycho@*********.co.nz> writes:
> On Thu, 15 Jun 2000, Gurth wrote:
>
> > It prevents you from sniping with the spell at someone who isn't a
> > long-
> > term enemy of yours. You couldn't use it to take out a security
> > guard who
> > doesn't know you're there, for example. After all, it won't kill
> > potential
> > enemies (and if you want a "Slay Potential Enemies" spell, that's
> > fine by
> > me, but it'll just be Manabolt under another name.)

Actually, I don't think the enemies have to be long term.

> I'd expect the spell to only work on targets who are actively
> thinking
> hostile thoughts about the caster (which generally means targets who
> know
> you're there and have some reason to not like you). Like, for
> example,
> that yakuza guy who is paranoid about non-yaks. Or, of course, the
> racist
> human/elf/orc/troll over there who hates [insert caster's race
> here].
<SNIP>

Nope. I don't think so. The aforementioned Yak would have to 1) know you
exist; 2) know you are a non-yak; and 3) be actively having a hostile
disposition towards you. (the racist would substitute 'know you are
[insert race]' for qualifier number 2.)

The spell is not detect my potential enemies. Nor is it detect enemies of
people like me. It's detect MY enemies.

--
D. Ghost
Profanity is the one language all programmers know best
- Troutman's 6th programming postulate.

________________________________________________________________
YOU'RE PAYING TOO MUCH FOR THE INTERNET!
Juno now offers FREE Internet Access!
Try it today - there's no risk! For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.