Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Gurth gurth@******.nl
Subject: Turn to goo spell effects
Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2000 19:18:23 +0200
According to Phil Smith, at 11:04 on 17 Jun 00, the word on the street
was...

> >That's exactly the problem: what's the area of effect of a single-target
> >spell?
>
> Or rather; how big can a single target be?

It was a bit of a rhetorical question... If a building is a single target
(or even if its structure is a single target, with doors etc. being
separate ones) then you can hit the whole of it with a single-target
spell, even though your area of effect can be much larger this way than
with any area-effect spell.

> >Except that in that case, the goo-ed building covers everything you may
> >want to get out of it, so you'll have to search through the mess...
>
> But still, any guards inside promptly fall as the building collapses around
> them

True. Could be a good way of getting them out of the way :)

> and if you have a good idea where the prototype would be or a detect
> (object) spell, your life would be mage a lot easier if the building
> could be goo-ed.

The trouble with Detect (Object) spells is that this isn't AD&D, where you
can learn a spell when you think you'll need it (or Ars Magica, which
allows you yo improvise a spell's effects). Having a Detect Latest Ares
Prototype Gizmo spell is useful for a single run, but that's it...

--
Gurth@******.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/index.html
Here come the golden oldies. Here come the Hezbollah.
-> NAGEE Editor * ShadowRN GridSec * Unofficial Shadowrun Guru <-
->The Plastic Warriors Page: http://shadowrun.html.com/plasticwarriors/<-

GC3.1: GAT/! d-(dpu) s:- !a>? C+(++)@ UL P L+ E? W(++) N o? K- w+ O V? PS+
PE Y PGP- t(+) 5++ X++ R+++>$ tv+(++) b++@ DI? D+ G(++) e h! !r(---) y?
Incubated into the First Church of the Sqooshy Ball, 21-05-1998

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.