Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Fanguad fanguad@****.rit.edu
Subject: Spells above Force 6
Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2000 18:08:45 -0400
On 17 Jun 2000, at 13:53, NeoJudas wrote:

> Intelligence of twice force??? I'm digging out my book now.... yeah, page
> 180 (SR3)... "Intelligence" is never a part of this formula, and I think
> that people keep forgetting other things that actually do help them "learn"
> the spell from the formula. Also, it won't ever take more than two months
> (60 days) for a Deadly drain spell. In fact, if you have a force 60 spell
> (OMG!!!!) I think we should all be very afraid.... as learning a spell takes
> force in DAYS to learn. Designing it at most would take 60 days....

But you have to score at least one success to learn the spell.
Sure, the base time for a Force 60 spell is two months, but I'd like
to see ANYONE (and that includes Dunky & Harley) hit TN#120.

You are correct about Intelligence, though. It is a Sorcery Test,
using Magic Background as a Complementary Skill. An instructor
can also add dice to the test.

> No offense guy, but go back and relearn the rules for this kind of thing, it
> is VERY clear that at least your recollection isn't the best.

Not to be rude, but you need to read all the rules. We all make
mistakes, especially when it comes to something as complex as
Shadowrun.

-- Fanguad

---------------------------------

"Tech Support, Greg speaking."
"QUICK! How do I change my wallpaper?"
"Well, it's pretty easy. I assume you want to change the
appearance of your desktop?"
"I need to get a picture off my background!"
"Oh, I see... Did someone accidentally set a porn picture
as their wallpaper, and their wife or mom is about
to show up?"
"PLEASE HURRY!"

-- Iliad, User Friendly

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.