Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Patrick Goodman remo@***.net
Subject: BIG! Critters
Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2000 09:41:23 -0500
From: Gurth
Sent: Saturday, June 17, 2000 5:01 AM

> > Assuming a western dragon was in the same weight class as, say,
> > brachiosaurus (I've seen weight estimates of up to 45 tons for
> > a big one of those), we're looking at...hmmm, let's just call
> > it 35 tons, or 31,750 kg (actually, it's slightly more, but let's
> > keep it at round numbers for purposes of this demonstration.
>
> How about using 1 ton = 1,000 kg in that case? It'll make your whole
> calculations a lot easier, IMHO...

It would have made the demonstration easier, true, but it wouldn't have been
accurate. Most of the weights I'm familiar with for big critters is listed
in short tons (2,000 pounds) versus metric tons (1,000 kg). Wanting to
stick to the metric system as much as possible, some conversion is probably
going to be necessary; fortunately, I have an old VB3 metric converter
program that makes my life much easier in that regard.

But you're right, for this example I should have just said 35,000 kg and
been done with it (which, incidentally, would take 44 trolls with Strength
and Body both at 10, expending a lot of effort in a simple deadlift, to pick
up; carrying would be a different story).

--
Patrick E. Goodman
remo@***.net
"I'm going to tell you something cool." -- Gene Wolfe




>
> --
> Gurth@******.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/index.html
> Here come the golden oldies. Here come the Hezbollah.
> -> NAGEE Editor * ShadowRN GridSec * Unofficial Shadowrun Guru <-
> ->The Plastic Warriors Page: http://shadowrun.html.com/plasticwarriors/<-
>
> GC3.1: GAT/! d-(dpu) s:- !a>? C+(++)@ UL P L+ E? W(++) N o? K- w+ O V? PS+
> PE Y PGP- t(+) 5++ X++ R+++>$ tv+(++) b++@ DI? D+ G(++) e h! !r(---) y?
> Incubated into the First Church of the Sqooshy Ball, 21-05-1998
>
>
>

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.