Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Adam J adamj@*********.html.com
Subject: TSS-12 is out! (Was Re: NAGEE 9 released)
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2000 12:58:51 -0600
At 20:07 6/22/00 +0200, Gurth wrote:

>> (and now I'll rediscover all those typo's that I fixed in the PDF file and
>> then lost when I had to regenerate the whole thing..)
>
>Is that an attempt to cheer me up by hinting that I'm not the only one
>suffering from these sorts of things? :)

Just open Man and Machine and look at pages 102-123. ;-)

TSS-12 was largely painless, actually. It would have been even easier if I
didn't delay the release for a month while waiting for dumpshock to launch
(I had already finished my site and embedded links to it), and then I got a
last minute review of Brainscan and had to throw that in, and that threw
off the page numbers, because I do some wacky shit with Pagemaker "Books"
to make sure the page numbers are the same throughout the regular and
"lite" versions of the magazine. And there were a few other issues, but I
honestly can't remember them all. <g>

(And I just found out about the first "Show Stopper" error in TSS. I
accidentally put a forward slash instead of a backslash in the SwiftOne
Speaks file (http://tss.dumpshock.com/html/tss-12/art12-j.htm), and while
IE is smart enough to automatically flip-flop it around, Netscape doesn't
do so, so I didn't notice this until Mark just pointed it out to me. Both
the online file and the ZIP of the HTML version are fixed.)

Adam
--
< adamj@*********.com | ICQ# 2350330 | TSS Productions >
< The Shadowrun Supplemental: http://tss.dumpshock.com >
< ShadowFAQ: http://shadowfaq.dumpshock.com >
< ShadowRN Assistant Fearless Leader: http://lists.dumpshock.com >

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.