Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: dbuehrer@******.carl.org dbuehrer@******.carl.org
Subject: Home Grown Autofire Rules
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2000 11:35:09 -0600
Tzeentch wrote:
>From: <dbuehrer@******.carl.org>
>
> > If the FA burst scatters, roll 1d6 to determine the direction
> > of the scatter: 1-2 left, 3 up, 4-5 right, 6 down.
>
>Is this really important for SR?

No, but it's important for these rules. If you're going to have scatter,
you need to determine the direction somehow.

Is scatter important? I like it. If you don't like the scatter bit, but
like the rest, chuck the scatter bit :)

> > Once the center point of the FA burst has been determined, figure out the
> > spread of the FA burst next. Muliply the unmodified recoil by the range
> > level to determine the diameter of the FA burst in meters: Close Range x1,
> > Medium Range x2, Long Range x3, Extreme Range x4.
>
>This is why I say 2d6 is too much. If the target is 4 meters away I can
>somehow still miss him by 12+ meters in any direction which seems hmm,
>unreasonable.

oops. Thank you very much for pointing that out.

hmmmmm....

Gonna have to think about this for a bit.

> > To determine the chances of a target being hit, determine the density of
> > the FA burst by dividing the number of rounds fired by the burst radius
> > (round normally). Roll a number of dice equal to the density vs a 4
> > (modified by cover) vs each target within the burst radius. Successes
> > result in a target being hit. Successes stage damage normally.
>
>Sounds good to me. Perhaps note that each tracer fired reduces the Density
>Test TN by 1? That would at least make them useful unlike in the standard
>rules.

I haven't figured out how to fit the tracer rules into it yet. Have to
re-read the tracer rules when I get home. But I like your idea :)


To Life,
-Graht
http://www.users.uswest.net/~abaker3
--
"What you are doing at the moment must be exactly what
you are doing at the moment--and nothing else."

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.