Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Brian Johnson expatrie@*******.net
Subject: Spell idea - Hold Breath
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2000 18:35:29 -0500
S O'Neill wrote:

> Brian Johnson wrote:
>
>
> >First: I'd change the duration to sustained. Second, what was wrong with
> >oxygenate?
>
> To respond:
> Duration --> I leaned towards Permanent because I saw this as a physical
> effect that faded with time rather than a constantly sustained magical
> effect. Also, I generally play mages with less-than-optimal ability, so
> trying to sustain one spell while casting others is something to be avoided.
>

Point taken, it's permanent like nutrition, etc. not permanent like healing. Ok.
Basically spell ends when you open your mouth? breathe normally. I just feel
sustained is more in-line with SR/etc. spells. Permanent spells return from
abnormal states (injury, etc.)...

> Oxygenate --> Nothing's _wrong_ with this spell; however it's got a coupla
> drawbacks with regard to fulfilling the purpose I'm looking at here. First,
> as mentioned above, it's sustained. Second, it only provides additional dice
> to resist airborne gases... and extra dice against high TNs don't mean squat
> to me. I'm looking for an all-or-nothing solution. You can hold your breath
> and not be affected by inhaled gases using the rules for holding your breath
> (in Cyberpirates, I think . . .). With Oxygenate you'd still be drawing the
> bad air into your lungs.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Callahan
>
>

Switch to - tn mechanic, doesn't that exist in the MITS rules? I'm still G2/AWA
so I wouldn't know.

"It's not like I'm using [Shadowrun]... it's just like my mind developed this
massive cyberpunk deficiency." [W.Gibson, misquoted]




_______________________________________________
Why pay for something you could get for free?
NetZero provides FREE Internet Access and Email
http://www.netzero.net/download/index.html

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.