Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Phil Smith phil_urbanhell@*******.com
Subject: Called Shots.
Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2000 13:57:42 GMT
>From: Aristotle <antithesis@**********.com>
>Greetings -n- Salutations,
>
>I'm sure I've seen this discussed here before, but I really had no other
>place to ask. I always assumed that when making a called shot to an
>unarmored area of an opponent the target did not gain the benefit of the
>armor, but as I read through SR3 for the hundredth time I realized that it
>doesn't actually state that anywhere. I know that calling a shot adds +4 to
>the TN to hit the target and raises the damage level by one, but does the
>victim gain the benefit of their armor or not? I realize that this seems
>incredibly trivial, but I have 5 very impressionable players who need me to
>have all the answers.

The official stance on it is no; no ignoring armor, however, there is a
number of house rules out there which state that a character can call a shot
to lower armor ratings, for every 1 point of armor you wish to ignore take a
+1 to TNs to hit. This way you can shoot at someone with 5 points of
ballistic armor, taking a +4 target number and only allow them to use 1
point of armor to lower your weapon's power for their resistance test.

But then I base called shot modifiers on how small an area the shot is being
called to based on the cover table in CC, that way it's easier to call a
shot to anywhere but the target's head than it is to call the shot to their
head.

Hope this helps.

Phil

These are my principles; if you don't like them I have some others.
-Groucho Marx

________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.