Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Josh Harrison mataxes@****.net
Subject: Magic Question
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2000 00:17:41 -0400
Please forgive the funky formatting... I sent this to the wrong list address
the first time, and it came back to me...

> While handling downtime after the adventuer conlcuded this past weekend a
> question came up that had me kind of stumped. I know that the force of
most
> spells limits the degree of effect you can get out of them -- for
instance,
> a force 4 Heal can only at most heal 4 boxes of damage, regardless of the
> number of successes actually generated.
>
> The shaman in my group (who follows the Dragonslayer totem/idol) wanted to
> learn the "Increase Reflexes" spell -- the one that adds dice to
initiative.
> He couldn't see any reason to take the spell at higher than Force 1,
because
> there is no degree of success for it; the spell either works or it
doesn't.
> So the spell was easy to find, buy, and learn.
>
> I can't say that I disagree with him -- it makes the drain much easier to
> resist, even with the +3 version he took. The only reason I could think of
> was that dispelling is based off the force of the target spell, and the
> spell will be knocked out fairly easily -- since Dispelling isn't
metamagic
> anymore, that is a valid concern (for once).
>
> Bu does this seem right to anybody else? There was no indication in the
> spell's description that the number of succeses had anything to do with
> casting the spell. Has anybody else encountered this, and what house rules
> have you developed, if any? I warned him that I may came to the game next
> week with a new ruling on the spell.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> -- Josh
>
>
>

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.