Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Damian Sharp zadoc@***.neu.edu
Subject: Sustanined/Perminant
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2000 00:57:21 -0400 (EDT)
On Thu, 29 Jun 2000, [iso-8859-1] Rand Ratinac wrote:

> > >From: Damian Sharp <zadoc@***.neu.edu>
> > >Well, what I thought of, and I'm surprised no one
> said it...
> > >
> > >Make a sustained verion & have an elemental sustain
> it for you. It can be expensive, money-wise (sorta),
> but it's not karma, at least.
> >
> > Didn't think of that one. Except for shamen
> (shamans?) the monetary costs for elementals are
> significantly higher :)>
> > Phil
>
> Of course, there IS the possibility of devoting an
> elemental purely to sustaining the spell (it can
> sustain it for (Force) days, but once it's done, it's
> gone).
>
> Actually, Damian, scratch my earlier not working
> comment, if this is what you were referring to. That's
> actually a good idea if you've got a bit of money to
> burn.

Yeah, that's pretty much what I was thinking of. Little elementals.

> Phil, your guy only wants the tattoo for a one
> night/one party deal, right? Well, if he's a mage, he
> can summon a force 1 elemental for only 1k and devote
> it to sustaining the spell. 24 hours later, the
> elemental and the spell pop, but you don't need it
> anymore.
>
> If you've got a bit of money to burn, that's not such
> a bad deal.

And it's definately better than spending karma each night, then dispelling
it.

Besides, if you use those 'Make your own materials' rules, at least in
SR2, it was a lot cheaper, though a bit more time consuming. And still
better than using a karma each night. :)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Damian Sharp of Real Life, College Student |
| Zauviir Seldszar of Wildlands, Scribe of House Maritym |
| Xavier Kindric of Shandlin's Ferry, member of Valindar |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Don't speak Latin in front of the books"

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.