From:	Nightfox <DJWA@******.UCC.NAU.EDU>
Subject:	wyrm and solarial
Date:	Thu, 14 Oct 1993 17:05:43 -0700

Erik,
SFO isn't close enough???!!! Hell, it's right on the bay, according to my
California map. Unless it was destroyed or severely damaged.

Tom
=========================================================================
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 1998 02:18:07 -0700
Reply-To: ShadowTk Plot and Administrative Discussion
<PLOTD@********.ITRIBE.NET>
Sender: ShadowTk Plot and Administrative Discussion
<PLOTD@********.ITRIBE.NET>
From: Jeffrey Mach <mach@****.CALTECH.EDU>
Subject: Re: PLOTD Digest - 6 Apr 1998 to 7 Apr 1998
In-Reply-To: <83e4281e.352b210e@***.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

On Wed, 8 Apr 1998, Craigtw1 wrote:

> Erik,
> SFO isn't close enough???!!! Hell, it's right on the bay, according to my
> California map. Unless it was destroyed or severely damaged.

It is a bit big, though....

Actually, both the Oakland airport and SFO are near the water, but on
opposite sides of the bay. In case you have to miss the runway, it is
better to hit soft water than hard ground. Funny thing is, IIRC, there use
to be this flight that went from Oakland to SFO to pick up more
passengers. They didn't even bother to retract the landing gear.

--Catch you later