Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: "Michael A. Kauffman" <mak9@******.EDU>
Subject: costs
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 1993 13:12:51 EDT
glad to a little more activity on this list.

Someone, the Reverend I believe, brought up the cost of armor. This makes me
ask: when are we going to deal with costs? We haven't even talked about cost
for anything yet. I was under the impression that we were going to go through
the mechanics of the system first and then come back and determine costs. Or
do we want to deal with costs now? Opinions?

Mike Kauffman
AKA Amonchare
Message no. 2
From: "Chad S. Mawson" <csm2747@************.EDU>
Subject: Costs
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 1993 12:27:39 CDT
First, I'm terribly sorry I have not been contributing to this List, now that
Dead Week is upon me, next week, I can relax a little. My posts will hopefully
become more frequent. In regards to, If there's no response I'll take it as an
OK, please do.

Now, costs, why don't we go ahead and discuss that now, and if need be adjust
later? I say that because a decision about the expense of something now, may
be thrown out of whack by another widget later. (I hope that makes *some*
sense) But if we get it out of the way now, it's less to worry about later.

+-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-+
| Chad Mawson *-* History Major, Nebraska Weseleyan University *-* |
| Internet e-mail: csm2747@******.nebrwesleyan.edu Lincoln, Nebraska |
| |
| ->-> 13. If your attack is going well, you have walked into an ambush <-<-
|
+-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-+

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about costs, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.

Thwap!