Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: "Glenn F. Gorsuch" <ggorsuch@****.CSUCHICO.EDU>
Subject: Rules Reality vs Playability
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 93 21:52:38 CET
Ok, everyone, deep breath. In...out, there we go. Look, both our Leerless
Feeder _and_ ArkAngel have valid points. I know there are a large number of
people out there who can't stand to have the slightest bit of unreality in
their gaming, and there are others who shudder at the thought of numbers above
ten (unless they've got their shoes off :). Me, I'll take the middle route.
What say we use these nice equations thoughtfully provided by the authenticity
mavens to produce some real numbers. Then stuff 'em in a chart or three, so
that User X out there can look at, say, a large car and see a variety of
engines to put in it.

I'd be willing to bet that some ambitious programmer type (which I certainly
am NOT) could take those equations and whip up a dinky little program that would
put all the numbers into a nice neat format. And hey, we could always put the
equations into appendix A or some such so the authenticity mavens could have
their fun too. It's a big Matrix out there folks, there's room for us all.
Besides, this is fun, right? Right? Treat it as such--we might not get done
_quite_ as fast, but there will be less stress on all concerned.

--
This insightful commentary was brought to you by Glenn G. Gorsuch. Treasure it.
Address? Oh yeah. It's: ggorsuch@******.ecst.csuchico.edu Like I'd lie :).
"When the dragon smiles, DON'T stop to count his teeth. Really."
I stand behind everything I just said. Way behind, if possible. Miles, even.

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Rules Reality vs Playability, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.