Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: "Robert A. Hayden" <hayden@*******.MANKATO.MSUS.EDU>
Subject: ADMIN: Online Logs
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 1994 12:28:28 -0600
I have received word from the powers that be at Hearn that the past logs
are starting to take up a little bit of room (perhaps 20 megs). They
would like some solutions about how to fix that.

Ideas:
1) Remove everything prior to say Auguest 1993
2) Compress old logs. I'm not sure how this would happen, maybe
put into a uuencoded .zip (will save about 30 to 35 percent)
3) ?????

I'd appreciate some input about what I should do with them. The Lord of
HEARN would like to keep them online, but I'm not really sure HOW to
accomplish this effectively. Please offor opinions.

NOTE: ShadowTK opinions should be sent to PLOT-D, not to ShadowTK, and
I'll get really cranky at anyone that doesn't do that.

Thanks for your time.

____ Robert A. Hayden <=> hayden@*******.mankato.msus.edu
\ /__ -=-=-=-=- <=> -=-=-=-=-
\/ / Finger for Geek Code Info <=> In the United States, they
\/ Finger for PGP 2.3a Public Key <=> first came for us in Colorado...
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
(GEEK CODE 1.0.1) GAT d- -p+(---) c++(++++) l++ u++ e+/* m++(*)@ s-/++
n-(---) h+(*) f+ g+ w++ t++ r++ y+(*)
Message no. 2
From: J D Falk <jdfalk@****.COM>
Subject: Re: ADMIN: Online Logs
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 1994 14:08:31 -40962758
Most of you will have just read my message on my opinions on what
to do with the Shadowrun logs.
The NERPS logs, however, are a different story. I'd say you
should get rid of all the NERPS: Shadowlore logs, since you've got all the
useful stuff in what will soon be a transmittable document.
Current NERPS logs should be kept, IMHO, because they're a good
backup in case some fragging drekhead gets into your system again.

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about ADMIN: Online Logs, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.