From: | David Buehrer <dbuehrer@******.CARL.ORG> |
---|---|
Subject: | Compilation Book (was Re: Additions to articles (was Re: |
Date: | Wed, 6 Aug 1997 06:39:28 -0600 |
)David Buehrer said on 6:48/ 5 Aug 97...
)
)> I was planning on approaching it with the idea of adding "my two
)> cents" to any of the article ideas that are finalized. Like writing
)> down 3+ paragraphs on whatever subject and letting Gurth edit it in
)> (;)). That way I won't get scared away, and once I get started on
)> something it might turn out to be article length after all (but don't
)> bet on it :).
)
)Well, my view is that it's up to the author of any article you're
)commenting on to use or disregard those comments; it's not my article so
)I'm not going to add stuff to the text (except corrected spelling and
)similar things).
)For example, say that Bull and Tinner post their Cleveland article, and
)David posts some decker comments for it. It's then up to Tinner or Bull to
)add in those comments David's made and re-post their article to the list.
I was refering to the Compilation Book, not the NAGTTW :)
-David
--
"ahh, kamisama! watashi no atama ni ono ga arimasu!"