Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: David Buehrer <dbuehrer@****.ORG>
Subject: NAGGTW Adventures?
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 1997 14:06:10 -0700
Denzil Kruse wrote on ShadowRN:
|
| If FASA decides not to make a complete sourcebook on a certain place, you
| have my vote for doing the the same thing it did with Hawai'i in Paradise
| Lost.
|
| And also adding in other optional or expanded rules like in Divided Assets
| (different kind of matrix system) and A Killing Glare (Urban Brawl rules,
| even though they were in Shadowbeat).

Gurth,

Would it be okay to throw in an adventure with the
City/Area submission for NAGTTW?

-David
--
/^\/^\/^\/^\/^\/^\/^\ dbuehrer@****.org /^\/^\/^\/^\/^\/^\/^\
"His thoughts tumbled in his head, making and breaking
alliances like underpants in a dryer without Cling Free."
~~~http://www.geocities.com/TimesSquare/1068/homepage.htm~~~~
Message no. 2
From: Gurth <gurth@******.NL>
Subject: Re: NAGGTW Adventures?
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 1997 12:12:45 +0100
David Buehrer said on 14:06/21 Jan 97...

> Gurth,

That's me...

> Would it be okay to throw in an adventure with the City/Area submission
> for NAGTTW?

Well... an adventure would be nice, but here you run into the matter that
this could mean a huge expansion of the book -- if three people all decide
they want to do an adventure for the area they're writing about, that's a
LOT of extra pages. IMHO if there should be an adventure, the best way to
do it would be like in the NAN books: one adventure that takes the players
across the world to a number of the areas/countries/cities covered in the
NAGTTW. That requires either good organization to make sure the parts of
the module fit together, or just one or two people writing the adventure
after the rest of the book is finished.

What's the opinion of the rest of the list?

--
Gurth@******.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/index.html
I wonder why anyone would want to name their kid after an airport...?
-> NERPS Project Leader & Unofficial Shadowrun Guru <-
-> The Plastic Warriors Page: http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/plastic.html <-

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version 3.1:
GAT/! d-(dpu) s:- !a>? C+(++)@ U P L E? W(++) N o? K- w+ O V? PS+ PE
Y PGP- t(+) 5+ X++ R+++>$ tv+(++) b++@ DI? D+ G(++) e h! !r(---) y?
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
Message no. 3
From: David Buehrer <dbuehrer@****.ORG>
Subject: Re: NAGGTW Adventures?
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 1997 07:27:45 -0700
Gurth wrote:
|
| David Buehrer said on 14:06/21 Jan 97...
|
| > Would it be okay to throw in an adventure with the City/Area submission
| > for NAGTTW?
|
| Well... an adventure would be nice, but here you run into the matter that
| this could mean a huge expansion of the book -- if three people all decide
| they want to do an adventure for the area they're writing about, that's a
| LOT of extra pages.

Good point. I hadn't thought of that.

| IMHO if there should be an adventure, the best way to
| do it would be like in the NAN books: one adventure that takes the players
| across the world to a number of the areas/countries/cities covered in the
| NAGTTW. That requires either good organization to make sure the parts of
| the module fit together, or just one or two people writing the adventure
| after the rest of the book is finished.
|
| What's the opinion of the rest of the list?

I don't know if we can get organized enough to write an adventure for
NAGTTW :)

If I *do* write an adventure to go along with my project, I'll
probably end up posting it on my web page.

-David
--
/^\/^\/^\/^\/^\/^\/^\ dbuehrer@****.org /^\/^\/^\/^\/^\/^\/^\
"His thoughts tumbled in his head, making and breaking
alliances like underpants in a dryer without Cling Free."
~~~http://www.geocities.com/TimesSquare/1068/homepage.htm~~~~

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about NAGGTW Adventures?, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.