Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: "Paolo Falco" <Falco@****.it>
Subject: New logo and logos reply
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 1996 07:48:58 +0000
On 2 Jul 96, Mark A. Imbriaco wrote:

> I _really_ like the 'dark one' on Paolo's page. It would work
> very well on a web page with a dark background and, at least on
> my HP LJ4VM, it prints fairly nicely in black & white. (you
> lose the SR logo .. the red turns to a -very- light grey that
> isn't visible against the background)

Oh, gulp! The S Was meant to be blue! I have sent the wrong
logo! hee hee :) Actually, I had noticed that when greyscaled
the Shadowrun S became "transparent" (and thought of some evil
uses, you know, huge subliminal messgaes with "HEUTE DIE WELT,
MORGEN DER SONNENSYSTEM" written on them :)
***************************************************************
I will send the blue one ASAP, together with a NEW ONE by Paolo
(1) Marcucci. (Geez, I like that, and not just coz he's an
Italian like me. Unlike my stuff, his one is ELEGANT! :) You
*SHOULD* (repeat should) be able to see them at the usual
address when this message reaches you.

http://www.geocities.com/SoHo/2717/rpg.htm

As for greyscaling, I agree thoroughly with all of you, being
the proud owner of a B/W bubblejet. That is why I greyscale all
logos that pass from my grubby hands to see how they look :)

-----------------------------------------------------------------
Paolo Falco | "I closed my shop and you brought only ONE
Ironbound Section | ball???" (from "Clerks" - & experience)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
See the RollerBrawl rules and the Anarchic Lemming Corp. site at:
http://www.geocities.com/SoHo/2717
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about New logo and logos reply, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.