Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: "Paolo Falco, Explorer" <Falco@****.IT>
Subject: Private threads (was: Re: npc's)
Date: Sat, 14 Dec 1996 17:30:19 +0000
14 Dec 96, 12:17, on the downward time curve to Armageddon, Gurth
said:

> Paolo Falco, Explorer said on 0:17/14 Dec 96...
>
> > AHEMMM!!! :)
> > Do we really need this? I mean, the list is silent, but this can
> > only be qualified as spam! :)
>
> I guess it can, yes... NERPS isn't really for rules questions or
> GMing advice, it's a list where source material for SR gets written.
> This is not to suggest that you're not welcome or anything (quite
> the contrary), but anyone wanting to discuss the rules etc. should
> probably do so on ShadowRN -- subscribe to it in the same way you
> subscribed to NERPS, but substiture "ShadowRN" for "NERPS".

They're perfectly welcome to discuss whatever they want inherently to
Shadowrun IMHO, even on NERPS. After all, we all ahve gone a lot off
topic sometimes.

But when I wrote my reply, they were talking about friends in
germany! :) IMHO that qualifies perfectly as a private mailing
thread! I was just suggesting that I actually don't care very much
about who has friends in germany and who hasn't. Especially at 00.00
Zulu Time when I am waiting for the last VGA planets turn, which
makes me rather nervous and may account for my rudeness :) :) :) :) :)

------------------------------------------------------------------
Paolo Falco | "And they'll never know the gold, or the copper
(Explorer) | in your hair" (S.Vega:"The world before Columbus")
------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.geocities.com/SoHo/2717
Paradoxal Skating page for Gamers with AnarcoLemming view on life

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Private threads (was: Re: npc's), you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.