Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Jesper Soderlund <erax3@*******.ERICSSON.SE>
Subject: What about contributions...
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 1994 08:32:28 +0200
Hello,
I was wondering whether it'd be appropriate to submitt something to the NERPS
Shadowlore II eventhough the material has been submitted to NAGEE.

I know that it happened with Shadowlore and NAGEE 5.

I think that it's really good, but then again I wrote it :->.

/Jeppe

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jesper Soderlund "Ours is not to reason why,
Computer Science Major Ours is but to do and die"
c89jesso@***.ida.liu.se - Tennyson's "Charge of the light brigade"
Linkoping Institute of technology
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Message no. 2
From: "Robert A. Hayden" <hayden@******.MANKATO.MSUS.EDU>
Subject: Re: What about contributions...
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 1994 18:58:14 +0100
On Thu, 28 Jul 1994, Jesper Soderlund wrote:

> Hello,
> I was wondering whether it'd be appropriate to submitt something to the NERPS
> Shadowlore II eventhough the material has been submitted to NAGEE.

I guess I really don't care all that much. I've talked with the editor
of NAGEE and we both have a sort of different approach. My goal is to
produce fairly dry, indepth, rules. NAGEE tends to be more fluffy, sort
of like rumors and notes and stuff.

Essentially, I guess, they can go either place or both, _I_ don't really
care.

____ Robert A. Hayden <=> hayden@******.mankato.msus.edu
\ /__ -=-=-=-=- <=> -=-=-=-=-
\/ / Finger for Geek Code Info <=> I do not necessarily speak for the
\/ Finger for PGP Public Key <=> City of Mankato or anyone else, dammit
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
(GEEK CODE 2.1) GJ/CM d- H-- s-:++>s-:+ g+ p? au+ a- w++ v* C++(++++) UL++++$
P+>++ L++$ 3- E---- N+++ K+++ W M+ V-- -po+(---)>$ Y++ t+ 5+++
j R+++$ G- tv+ b+ D+ B--- e+>++(*) u** h* f r-->+++ !n y++**

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.

Thwap!