Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Tim Cooper <tpcooper@***.CSUPOMONA.EDU>
Subject: What's with NERPS?
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 1997 13:36:02 -0800
For the longest time I haven't gotten any NERPS posts, then suddenly I get
one from Bull, but it's a reply to previous post (which I didn't get), then
nothing happens for about a week, and now I get 2 more "random" posts, both
happen to be replies to something that someone else wrote (which I also
didn't get)... Help!!

~Tim (who is very confus-ed)
~Tim
<Insert Witty Comment>
Message no. 2
From: Gurth <gurth@******.NL>
Subject: Re: What's with NERPS?
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 1997 11:42:14 +0100
Tim Cooper said on 13:36/17 Mar 97...

> For the longest time I haven't gotten any NERPS posts, then suddenly I get
> one from Bull, but it's a reply to previous post (which I didn't get), then
> nothing happens for about a week, and now I get 2 more "random" posts, both
> happen to be replies to something that someone else wrote (which I also
> didn't get)... Help!!

NERPS has been quiet for some time, but you should be getting more posts
than just those from Bull. For one thing, you should have received a few
posts from Gweedo, me, and Matt Breton over the past few days. If you
haven't, you could try unsubscribing and then subscribing again.

(Note that I've cc:ed this message to you, so as to make sure you get
it.)

--
Gurth@******.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/index.html
I like having low self esteem. Makes me feel special.
-> NERPS Project Leader & Unofficial Shadowrun Guru <-
-> The Plastic Warriors Page: http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/plastic.html <-

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version 3.1:
GAT/! d-(dpu) s:- !a>? C+(++)@ U P L E? W(++) N o? K- w+ O V? PS+ PE
Y PGP- t(+) 5++ X++ R+++>$ tv+(++) b++@ DI? D+ G(++) e h! !r(---) y?
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about What's with NERPS?, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.

Thwap!