Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Ken Dye <kdye@*****.STANFORD.EDU>
Subject: Arent As...les wonderfull things....
Date: Sun, 3 Jul 1994 10:16:55 -0700
I just got a notice that I was removed from the shadowrn list by
doctor doom. What did I do? Why was I removed? Hell this sucks.
Message no. 2
From: Jai Tao <jdfalk@****.CAIS.COM>
Subject: Re: Arent As...les wonderfull things....
Date: Sun, 3 Jul 1994 22:28:06 -0400
On Sun, 3 Jul 1994, Ken Dye wrote:

> I just got a notice that I was removed from the shadowrn list by
> doctor doom. What did I do? Why was I removed? Hell this sucks.
>
First, read the SHADOWRN FAQ. If that doesn't help, try asking
Doctor Doom (and I might suggest correct capitalization in order to show
appropriate respect.)
Message no. 3
From: Jai Tao <jdfalk@****.CAIS.COM>
Subject: Re: Arent As...les wonderfull things....
Date: Sun, 3 Jul 1994 22:37:27 -0400
On Sun, 3 Jul 1994, Jai Tao wrote:

> On Sun, 3 Jul 1994, Ken Dye wrote:
>
> > I just got a notice that I was removed from the shadowrn list by
> > doctor doom. What did I do? Why was I removed? Hell this sucks.
> >
> First, read the SHADOWRN FAQ. If that doesn't help, try asking
> Doctor Doom (and I might suggest correct capitalization in order to show
> appropriate respect.)
>
I should also mention that Doctor Doom co-manages this list as
well, so calling him an As...le is likely to get you deleted from both,
_permenantly._ In fact, if you continue to do so, I will fully support
such an action.

"I may be as bad as the worst /-----------------\
but, thank God, | Jai Tao |
I am as good as the best." | jdfalk@****.com |
-Walt Whitman \-----------------/

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.