Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: "Robert A. Hayden" <hayden@*******.MANKATO.MSUS.EDU>
Subject: Introductory Materials
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 1994 11:24:13 -0500
The intro-package I send out to everyone does include both halves of the
FAQ. Dunno why Tim only got one.

____ Robert A. Hayden <=> hayden@*******.mankato.msus.edu
\ /__ -=-=-=-=- <=> -=-=-=-=-
\/ / Finger for Geek Code Info <=> Political Correctness is
\/ Finger for PGP 2.3a Public Key <=> P.C. for "Thought Police"
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
(GEEK CODE 1.0.1) GAT d- -p+(---) c++(++++) l++ u++ e+/* m++(*)@ s-/++
n-(---) h+(*) f+ g+ w++ t++ r++ y+(*)
Message no. 2
From: DJ Wipeout <wipeout@***.COM>
Subject: Introductory Materials
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 1994 13:47:10 -0400
To: Net Enhancements for Role Playing Shadowrn <NERPS@*****.NIC.SURFNET.NL>
Subject: Introductory Materials
In-Reply-To: <199404181712.NAA06191@**********.dhp.com>
References: <199404181712.NAA06191@**********.dhp.com>
Reply-To: wipeout@***.com (DJ Wipeout)

Robert A. Hayden writes:
> The intro-package I send out to everyone does include both halves of the
> FAQ. Dunno why Tim only got one.
>

I got both halves. In the wrong order, but I got both halves. :)

wipeout@***.com: Co-Maintainer, The DataHaven Project.
Message no. 3
From: Timothy Skirvin <tskirvin@********.UNI.UIUC.EDU>
Subject: Re: Introductory Materials
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 1994 12:59:39 -0500
Yeah, they were there. For some reason, something happened at my
end...

I did notice, after getting it to work, that the order of them was
reversed. It shouldn't matter, but it's strange...

----------------------- "Well, you see, they took the Bible literally.
Tim Skirvin Adam and Eve, the snake and the apple...took
(tskirvin@ it word for word. Unfortunately, their
superdec.uni.uiuc.edu) version had a misprint."
----------------------- - Rimmer, Red Dwarf (The Last Day)

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.

Thwap!