Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Bruce <gyro@********.CO.ZA>
Subject: Re :More Magazine Thoughts
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 1998 14:41:23 +0200
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_003F_01BDD67F.C1ABE2E0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Original Message-----
From: Geoff Skellams <geoff.skellams@*********.COM.AU>
To: NERPS@********.ITRIBE.NET <NERPS@********.ITRIBE.NET>
Date: 02 September 1998 11:37
Subject: Re: More magazine thoughts (was Re: Gurth has some ideas)


<snippage of votes against magazine>
> There are two books currently "active" (Guide to the Rest of =
the
>World and Stuff). Neither of them seem to be getting any submissions. =
If
>we are going to revitalise NERPS, then perhaps we need to put these on
>hold and start something else. I'm not saying this because I suggested =
a
>couple of possibilities that people seem to like. I am suggesting this
>because it seems reasonably obvious that people AREN'T going to submit
>stuff for the active books in a hurry, good intentions or no. Maybe a
>new and smaller focused topic would give NERPS the shot in the arm that
>it needs to recover some of its former glory.


As geoff pointed out there are two active books. Really? as a newbie and
VERY ambitious writer, I had no idea... Please do tell us newbies how to =
go
about submitting... if we may and what the heck you are looking for. I =
think
an article on the Sub-Saharan Africa situation in 2059 or whatever would =
go
down well...

Please inform us... thank you



------=_NextPart_000_003F_01BDD67F.C1ABE2E0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>

<META content=text/html;charset=iso-8859-1 =
http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content='"MSHTML 4.72.2106.6"' name=GENERATOR>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV>Original Message-----<BR>From: Geoff Skellams &lt;<A
href="mailto:geoff.skellams@*********.COM.AU">geoff.skellams@*********.=
COM.AU</A>&gt;<BR>To:
<A =
href="mailto:NERPS@********.ITRIBE.NET">NERPS@********.ITRIBE.NET</A>
=
&lt;<A
href="mailto:NERPS@********.ITRIBE.NET">NERPS@********.ITRIBE.NET</A>&g=
t;<BR>Date:
02 September 1998 11:37<BR>Subject: Re: More magazine thoughts (was Re: =
Gurth
has some ideas)<BR><BR><BR>&lt;snippage of votes against
magazine&gt;<BR>&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
There are =
two
books currently &quot;active&quot; (Guide to the Rest of =
the<BR>&gt;World and
Stuff). Neither of them seem to be getting any submissions. If<BR>&gt;we =
are
going to revitalise NERPS, then perhaps we need to put these =
on<BR>&gt;hold and
start something else. I'm not saying this because I suggested =
a<BR>&gt;couple of
possibilities that people seem to like. I am suggesting =
this<BR>&gt;because it
seems reasonably obvious that people AREN'T going to submit<BR>&gt;stuff =
for the
active books in a hurry, good intentions or no. Maybe a<BR>&gt;new and =
smaller
focused topic would give NERPS the shot in the arm that<BR>&gt;it needs =
to
recover some of its former glory.<BR><BR><BR>As geoff pointed out there
=
are two
active books. Really? as a newbie and<BR>VERY ambitious writer, I had no =
idea...
Please do tell us newbies how to go<BR>about submitting... if we may and =
what
the heck you are looking for. I think<BR>an article on the Sub-Saharan =
Africa
situation in 2059 or whatever would go<BR>down well...<BR><BR>Please =
inform
us... thank you<BR><BR></DIV></BODY></HTML>

------=_NextPart_000_003F_01BDD67F.C1ABE2E0--

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about More Magazine Thoughts, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.