Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: "Dark Thought Publications." <JEK5313@*****.TAMU.EDU>
Subject: Naming ideas.
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 1993 13:01:49 -0500
] I have thought of NAGS, but as you told it in your mail,
]4 letters are not enough, and NAGTTS is REALLY horrible. ( is it
]what you think ?)
]
] That's why I've put "' life" after, and I tried on TOME.
]But it's my own opinion, so why don't you put your suggestion on
]TOME.


Hey Ben, I posted it. :)


How about, instead, we call it the _Neo-Anarchists' Guide to ShadowLife_?
NAGSL sounds a LOT better than NAGTTS.

Or EVEN:

Neo-Anarchists' ShadowGuide to Underground Life, or
NASGUL (which has a certain significance of its own, heh-heh-heh)


--Loki <Controlling Decker with Magic Fingers and Control Thoughts>
[Buy my book. On sale now: Loki's Decking Method ]
[Amaze your friends. Control your enemies. How to avoid ]
[Black IC. Just 19.95Y from this special Matrix offer. ]
[Order now and receive, absolutely free, a Ginsu(tm) ]
[Cop-Chopper, guaranteed to go through any armor on the ]
[street today, and still remain razor-sharp! ]
Message no. 2
From: "Bryan D. Jones" <bdj@****.UARK.EDU>
Subject: Re: Naming ideas.
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 1993 13:50:52 -0600
"In an earlier message Dark Thought Publications. quoted to Tome..."
>Neo-Anarchists' ShadowGuide to Underground Life, or
>NASGUL (which has a certain significance of its own, heh-heh-heh)
>
I like this one a LOT better than NERPS. Nerps just reminds me of
tiny crunchy candy.



--
_____________________________________________________________________
|Bryan D. Jones Computing Services |
|Internet: bdj@****.uark.edu University of Arkansas |
|Internet: bdj@****.uark.edu Bitnet bdj@******* |
|Internet: as724@*********.freenet.edu Fidonet: 1:391/1180 |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------|

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Naming ideas., you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.

Thwap!