Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Bull <chaos@*****.COM>
Subject: Re: Other Mailing Lists and the British
Date: Sun, 10 Nov 1996 05:33:06 -0500
Ok, to subscribe to ShadowRn, simply send a message like this:

TO: listserv@********.itribe.net
SUBJECT: <nothing>
MESSAGE: Subscribe shadowrn

To subscribe to ShadowGM (which is for GM's, and has been quiet lately):

TO: majordomo@******.residence.gatech.edu
SUBJECT: <blank, as usual>
MESSAGE: subscribe shadowgm

There is also ShadowTk and Plot-D, which are for an ongoing interactive game
based in the Shadowland BBS (at least, that's what it's supposed to be), and
you can subscribe to those the same as ShadowRn, just substitute "shadowtk"
or "plotd" for "shadowrn"...:)

>>As for other Brits, there should be several on NERPS, RN, and GM -- when
>>they post something, you can recognize them by the .uk at the end of
>>their addresses :)
>Just because they have .co.uk in their email doesn't mean they are british, I
>am british and my email is a .com.
>
This is true... But it (usually) indicates where they are mailing from.
Are you mailing from a US server? That would (probably) explain the .com at
the end of your addy. Most British addy's have the .uk, and you''ll notice
the .au at the end of the Australians addy.

And of course, having a British e-mail addy doesn't mean you ARE British...
Just ask Pete Sims... right Pete?

See ya...:)

-Bull-the-just-tryin'-to-be-helpful-some-more-decker-turned-GM


=======================================================
= Bull, aka Chaos, aka Rak, aka Steven Ratkovich =
= =
= chaos@*****,com =
= =
= "Order is Illusion! Chaos is Bliss! Got any fours?" =
=======================================================

"You could use a good Kiss!"
-Han Solo, "Star Wars"
<a corrected quote>

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Other Mailing Lists and the British, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.