Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: WILLIAM T COLEMAN <darkknight12@****.COM>
Subject: Request for feedback
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 1997 21:57:56 EDT
I was looking for some feedback on what people thought of using the
Tattoo Magic rules (pps. 96 - 97 UNDERWORLD SOURCEBOOK) to "etch" a
Quickened spell on a sword or some other object.

Also, what would happen if a magician quickened a spell that was only
active on the astral? Would the spell sit at the spot it was cast at?
What if the spell was Astral Blade (p.10 Shadowland Volume 6)?

Why is Shadowrun so popular in Europe?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bill Coleman
Message no. 2
From: David Buehrer <dbuehrer@******.CARL.ORG>
Subject: Re: Request for feedback
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 1997 08:36:53 -0600
WILLIAM T COLEMAN wrote:
)I was looking for some feedback on what people thought of using the
)Tattoo Magic rules (pps. 96 - 97 UNDERWORLD SOURCEBOOK) to "etch" a
)Quickened spell on a sword or some other object.
)
)Also, what would happen if a magician quickened a spell that was only
)active on the astral? Would the spell sit at the spot it was cast at?
)What if the spell was Astral Blade (p.10 Shadowland Volume 6)?
)
)Why is Shadowrun so popular in Europe?

Hi Bill :)

Sorry to tell you this, but NERPS isn't the appropriate forum for
these types of questions. The purpose of NERPS is to create net
source books for shadowrun (currently we're working on the
Neo-Anrachists Guide to the World).

Try posting those questions to ShadowRN
(shadowrn@********.itribe.net), and you'll get a good response
(hopefully helpfull too :)

-David
--
"O Moj Boze! Mam siekiere w glowie!"

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.

Thwap!