Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: postmaster-addressing@*****.COM
Subject: Returned e-mail
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 1996 12:10:54 -0800
The attached message could not be successfully delivered for the following reason, and has
been returned to the sender.
The message may not have been delivered to all recipients.

------------------------------------------------------------
The original message follows...

An enclosed file named cc:Mail has been extracted.
Message no. 2
From: Bull <chaos@*****.COM>
Subject: Re: Returned e-mail
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 1996 16:28:59 -0500
>The attached message could not be successfully delivered for the following
reason, and has been returned to the sender.
> The message may not have been delivered to all recipients.
>
>------------------------------------------------------------
>The original message follows...
>
>An enclosed file named cc:Mail has been extracted.
>
Ummm, what's this??

Did everyone get it? I know I didn't send out anything with attachments to
it... At least I shouldn't have...

Steve (Bull)


=======================================================
= Bull, aka Chaos, aka Rak, aka Steven Ratkovich =
= =
= chaos@*****,com =
= =
= "Order is Illusion! Chaos is Bliss! Got any fours?" =
=======================================================

"You could use a good Kiss!"
-Han Solo, "The Empire Strikes Back"
<a corrected once more quote>
Message no. 3
From: Loki <loki@*******.COM>
Subject: Re: Returned e-mail
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 1996 23:23:22 -0700
> >The attached message could not be successfully delivered for the
following
> reason, and has been returned to the sender.
> > The message may not have been delivered to all recipients.
> >
> >------------------------------------------------------------
> >The original message follows...
> >
> >An enclosed file named cc:Mail has been extracted.
> >
> Ummm, what's this??
>
> Did everyone get it? I know I didn't send out anything with attachments
to
> it... At least I shouldn't have...

I got it and I have no idea what its referring to. <shrug>


@>-,--'--- Loki

CLARKE'S THIRD LAW:
Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.

*********************************************
Poisoned Elves
http://www.netzone.com/~loki/
*********************************************
Message no. 4
From: NightLife <habenir@******.SAN.UC.EDU>
Subject: Re: Returned e-mail
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 1996 01:30:34 -0500
At 11:23 PM 11/12/96 -0700, Loki wrote:
>> >The attached message could not be successfully delivered for the
>following
>> reason, and has been returned to the sender.
>> > The message may not have been delivered to all recipients.
>> >
>> >------------------------------------------------------------
>> >The original message follows...
>> >
>> >An enclosed file named cc:Mail has been extracted.
>> >
>> Ummm, what's this??
>>
>> Did everyone get it? I know I didn't send out anything with attachments
>to
>> it... At least I shouldn't have...
>
>I got it and I have no idea what its referring to. <shrug>
>
>
> @>-,--'--- Loki

Just chalk it up to BDWW.


>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Nightlife Inc.
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

If you have to ask then it's probably classified.
Which means that I have to follow protocol.
But if you ask nicely I might forget that you asked.
Then again maybe not.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Document Classified
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Message no. 5
From: Bull <chaos@*****.COM>
Subject: Re: Returned e-mail
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 1996 03:11:13 -0500
>Just chalk it up to BDWW.
>
Why not, I'll bite...

What's BDWW?

-Bull-the-wonderin'-decker-turned-GM


=======================================================
= Bull, aka Chaos, aka Rak, aka Steven Ratkovich =
= =
= chaos@*****,com =
= =
= "Order is Illusion! Chaos is Bliss! Got any fours?" =
=======================================================

"You could use a good Kiss!"
-Han Solo, "The Empire Strikes Back"
<a corrected once more quote>
Message no. 6
From: NightLife <habenir@******.SAN.UC.EDU>
Subject: Re: Returned e-mail
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 1996 03:51:13 -0500
At 03:11 AM 11/13/96 -0500, Bull wrote:
>>Just chalk it up to BDWW.
>>
>Why not, I'll bite...
>
>What's BDWW?
>
Actually that should have read BDNWW which mean Broke Dit No Workee Workee.
It's a technical term


>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Nightlife Inc.
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

If you have to ask then it's probably classified.
Which means that I have to follow protocol.
But if you ask nicely I might forget that you asked.
Then again maybe not.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Document Classified
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Message no. 7
From: Gurth <gurth@******.NL>
Subject: Re: Returned e-mail
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 1996 13:09:32 +0100
postmaster-addressing@*****.C said on 12:10/12 Nov 96...

> The attached message could not be successfully delivered for the following reason,
and has been returned to the sender.
> The message may not have been delivered to all recipients.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> The original message follows...

Erik, what's your mailer doing?

--
Gurth@******.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/index.html
superficial urgency
-> NERPS Project Leader & Unofficial Shadowrun Guru <-
-> The Plastic Warriors Page: http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/plastic.html <-

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version 3.1:
GAT/! d-(dpu) s:- !a>? C+(++)@ U P L E? W(++) N o? K- w+ O V? PS+ PE
Y PGP- t(+) 5+ X++ R+++>$ tv+(++) b++@ DI? D+ G(++) e h! !r(---) y?
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Returned e-mail, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.

Thwap!