Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: "Robert A. Hayden" <hayden@*******.MANKATO.MSUS.EDU>
Subject: REVOKATION REQUEST
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 1995 19:29:09 -0600
I would like to get people to help me to force the revokation of the
'Implosion' submission. This is the spell that creates a "mana vortex".

This spell is an all-purpose destruction spell, that is easy to cast and
use, and is entirely munchkinious.

If you hate this spell as much as I do, please let me know so that I can
issue a proper revokation.

____ Robert A. Hayden <=> With liberty and justice for _all_...
\ /__ -=-=-=-=- <=> -=-=-=-=-
\/ / Finger for Geek Code Info <=> hayden@*******.mankato.msus.edu
\/ Finger for PGP Public Key <=> http://att2.cs.mankato.msus.edu/hayden
Message no. 2
From: Luc <rjwate01@********.SPD.LOUISVILLE.EDU>
Subject: Re: REVOKATION REQUEST
Date: Sat, 4 Mar 1995 14:47:09 EST
>
> I would like to get people to help me to force the revokation of the
> 'Implosion' submission. This is the spell that creates a "mana vortex".
>
> This spell is an all-purpose destruction spell, that is easy to cast and
> use, and is entirely munchkinious.
>
> If you hate this spell as much as I do, please let me know so that I can
> issue a proper revokation.
>
I instead offer a revision option, how about the effective force of the spell
for terms of drain, research, and cost to learn is three times the actual
rating which is used for damage purposes. (don't remember drain but should be
deadly and the multiplied force should be used to determine if drain is
physical or stun).

Luc
Message no. 3
From: Michael Guigliano <mike5571@****.ORG>
Subject: Re: REVOKATION REQUEST
Date: Sat, 4 Mar 1995 12:10:06 -0800
On Fri, 3 Mar 1995, Robert A. Hayden wrote:

> I would like to get people to help me to force the revokation of the
> 'Implosion' submission. This is the spell that creates a "mana vortex".
>
> This spell is an all-purpose destruction spell, that is easy to cast and
> use, and is entirely munchkinious.
>
> If you hate this spell as much as I do, please let me know so that I can
> issue a proper revokation.
>
> ____ Robert A. Hayden <=> With liberty and justice for _all_...
> \ /__ -=-=-=-=- <=> -=-=-=-=-
> \/ / Finger for Geek Code Info <=> hayden@*******.mankato.msus.edu
> \/ Finger for PGP Public Key <=> http://att2.cs.mankato.msus.edu/hayden
I also would like the implosion spell revoked !!!!

Mike aka THE CHROME DRAGON
Message no. 4
From: NIGHTFOX <DJWA@******.UCC.NAU.EDU>
Subject: Re: REVOKATION REQUEST
Date: Sat, 4 Mar 1995 14:02:30 -0700
>I would like to get people to help me to force the revokation of the
>'Implosion' submission. This is the spell that creates a "mana vortex".

I'll third it.

Nightfox
Message no. 5
From: "J.D. Falk" <jdfalk@****.CAIS.COM>
Subject: Re: REVOKATION REQUEST
Date: Sat, 4 Mar 1995 19:46:31 -0500
On Sat, 4 Mar 1995, Luc wrote:

> I instead offer a revision option, how about the effective force of the spell
> for terms of drain, research, and cost to learn is three times the actual
> rating which is used for damage purposes. (don't remember drain but should be
> deadly and the multiplied force should be used to determine if drain is
> physical or stun).

You have until Monday (tomorrow, in fact) to get that revision to
me in correct NERPS format. After that point, I'm going to download my
Shadowlore mail folder and begin editing.
Sorry to be such a hard-ass about this, but there's only so many
extensions I can tack onto this project and still have half a chance of
getting it done before the students on the list go home for the summer.

-------------========== J.D. Falk <jdfalk@****.com> =========-------------
| NERPS Project Leader (Editor & General Motivator), Keeper of the FAQ |
--------========== http://www.cais.com/jdfalk/home.html ==========--------

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about REVOKATION REQUEST, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.