Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Wordman <wordman@*******.COM>
Subject: [Stuff] Pocket Secretaries (first draft)
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1998 01:23:30 -0400
Pocket Secretaries
for NERPS: Stuff
by Wordman
wordman@*****.com

(>) Last night, I helped a chummer pull some data from a captured pocket
secretary. The intel ended up saving her life and earning us both a few
nuyen. With that in mind, I thought I'd post this article from last week's
Consumer Watch on the current crop of pocket secs so you know what's out
there. As always, please share what you know about these beasts, and how
runners can use them in particular.
(>) Capt. Chaos

POCKET SECRETARIES: NOT JUST FOR SUITS ANYMORE

Long a symbol of corporate affiliation and white-collar success, the pocket
secretary is growing in popularity in increasingly non-corporate markets,
such as education, farming and manufacture. You can even find them in many
auto-body shops around the world. This year's models begin to target this
emerging market and, combined with the breakup of Fuchi, this is crowding
the field. With this new market in mind, in addition to the usual product
analysis, Consumer Watch is pleased to offer a introduction what you
can expect for your money when buying a new pocket secretary.

(>) Consumer Watch claims to be a non-profit organization which does not
accept money from any corporation. I find that hard to believe. What's the
scan?
(>) Vasco

(>) Near as I can tell, it's true. I think the corps realize the PR benefit
of a good rating from a ``non-partial'' source. In some ways, its the best
sort of free advertisement you can get. What is not common knowledge,
though, is that megacorps, and some second-tier corps, send ``coaches'' (fo=
r
lack of a better word) to Consumer Watch to make sure that they know about
the strengths and best features of their products, and that can
significantly impact a review. I know this for a fact because I personally
was one of these ``coaches'' when I worked for Fuchi.
(>) Courtesan

Pocket secretaries are just that -- personal, electronic information
managers
which can fit in your pocket, or at least in your briefcase or backpack.
Pocket secretaries, often called ``pocket secs'', are designed to be owned
an
operated entirely by a single person. They function as a constant digital
companion, allowing you to stay in touch with others and organize your time=
,
needs, ideas and even desires in a single, powerful package.

(>) And this is why pocket secs are so useful to us. Shadowrunners, I mean.
People tell their secs stuff they'd never dream of telling their spouse,
lover, boss or shrink, even stuff that should never be written down. I have
literally found a pocket sec with a date book entry that said ``2:00pm:
Initiate double-cross of hired thugs''.
(>) Man on the Moon

(>) With you being the thug in question, Moon? Doubt it. Seriously, though,
if you are looking to blackmail or leverage someone, you could do worse tha=
n
to grab their pocket sec.
(>) Myra

(>) I can do much worse than that!
(>) Flip, the Bird

Communication

All secretaries contain digital cellular phones in some fashion, and most
act as pagers as well. In most cases, pager and phone service is extra, so
must be factored when considering the cost of a new pocket secretary.
Fortunately, pocket secs use standard cell phone technology, and in most
cases can be added to an existing plan.

(>) Just to spell out what this means for you slowpokes: this means that
using a pocket secretary carries all of the eavesdropping and triangulation
risks of a normal cell phone.
(>) Lariat

(>) Works both ways, chummer. You can intercept a suit's call, too.
(>) Fungus

Many cell-phone service providers sell voice-mail service for cellular
customers, but most pocket secretaries come with software which provides
call-screening, caller-id, voice-mail, and other advanced communications
services.

(>) One of my favorites is the ability to digitally record the conversation=
s
you have. You never know when a recording like that can be useful.
(>) Myra

(>) Oo, Myra, one of the things I love about you is that you play with fire=
.
Your own recordings can be used against you as well, so take care. I'd hate
to see anything happen to those beautiful... curves.
(>) Fungus

(>) Your concern is noted. Nauseating, but noted.
(>) Myra

Many of the devices reviewed here support vidphone communication. Usually, =
a
small compartment holds a miniature camera at the end of a two meter wire.
The camera is held or connected to an object in front of the speaker with a
built-in clip. Some models feature a rotating camera mounted above the
screen. In either configuration, the camera can also be used to snap photos
and flat video as well.

Being digital, most devices reviewed here can be made to make periodic
connections to the Matrix to download (or upload) information. This is
typically done to check e-mail on a regular basis, update stock prices and
synchronize banking transactions.

(>) What? I thought pocket secs couldn't use the Matrix!
(>) Avalaros

(>) Of course they can, dolt! Sure, you can't use them to deck, or even get
a VR interface, but they can connect and move data to and from the Matrix
just like any other computer. Just not very quickly, compared to a deck.
(>) Lipps

Nearly all pocket secs have a standard I/O port for connection with desktop
computers, datajacks, Matrix connections, external displays and other
peripherals like trideo cameras. Many of these devices also contain infrare=
d
communication ports which can send data do any from other pocket
secretaries, or any other device that uses Renraku's IRX standard.

Since banking is an important part of what a pocket sec does, most of these
devices contain a port for a credstick. This allows electronic banking in
the palm of your hand. (Many of these credstick readers also allow data
storage options as well. See ``Storage'', below.)

Software

The other component of day-to-day pocket sec use is the software inside it.
Most pocket secs come with a suite of personal productivity applications.

(>) I'm stepping in here. The article goes on at length about the wonders o=
f
modern application software. Snip, snip. The short version is that most
pocket secs come with an integrated software package which provides:
word-processing, spreadsheet capability, date book, address book, banking
and finance, e-mail, and so on. Usually, the OS also has advanced internal
search abilities and hypertext display system. This stuff usually takes up
about 25-50Mp.
(>) Capt. Chaos

(>) It bears mentioning as well that pocket secs are computers, and can run
a number of third-party software titles. I love Cartesia, a map display and
route analysis product. One the best selling titles is the truly impressive
Stark, a financial analysis system from Tablelands software. It ties into
the financial information in the secretary, and gives financial advice. If
you hook your sec up to the Matrix on occasion, Stark can download stock
information and give stock tips as well.
(>) Myra

(>) Like any other computers, pocket secs can be programmed. I've written a
number of custom applications for the secs of my running team.
(>) Scimitar

(>) Like what?
(>) Lipps

(>) I wrote a cheesy voice modulator, for example. Wouldn't fool a voice
analyzer, but most people wouldn't recognize the voice. You know, kind of
like those interviews with people who don't want to be seen and it sounds
like they're talking through water. There's other things, but that would be
telling.
(>) Scimitar

(>) I coded a controller for my pocket sec that would call up my home
computer and issue instructions to run the place, like turning lights on an=
d
off and so on. I can also suck images from some cameras I put in my
apartment from far away. There's some risk to wiring your doss like this,
but it has saved my hoop at least once.
(>) Steelseed

Interface

You control your pocket secretary through three primary methods: stylus,
keyboard and voice. Not all pocket secs allow all three of these, but most
offer at least two. Stylus control involves drawing and ``gesturing''
directly
on the screen with a pen-like object that comes with (and stored within) th=
e
device. Stylus control is coupled with real-time handwriting recognition,
translating what you write into digital symbols. Stylus control is useful
for drawing applications, but is used most often to input non-roman
languages, especially Japanese.

Keyboard input is naturally only available to devices which have keyboards,
which is about half of those on the market. Our tests have found that most
tasks are better suited to stylus or voice control than keyboards; however,
the keyboard is extremely useful in situations where you wish to compose a
message without speaking aloud, such as on an airplane. Most people can typ=
e
much faster than they can write, so the keyboard beats the stylus soundly i=
n
terms of speed.

Industry experts widely regard the current generation of pocket secretaries
as the first generation to universally offer perfected voice interface.
Voice interface has long been a staple of modern computing, but it is now s=
o
advanced that it can appear nearly magical, mostly because it has been
integrated with sophisticated ``agent'' software. For example, you can tel=
l
your pocket sec to ``schedule a meeting with Bob next week'' and your devic=
e
will find Bob in your address book, find time next week in your date book
when you are available, send Bob a standard schedule request e-mail, wait
for a reply, then create an appointment in your date book at the agreed tim=
e
and tell you about it. If it needs help along the way, if there are more
than one Bob, for example, it will ask you for clarification. Just like a
real secretary, the device will learn about your preferences as it interact=
s
with you

(>) An interesting weakness in the corporate world is that this ``standard
schedule request e-mail'' that got sent to Bob will likely be answered by
Bob's own pocket sec, not Bob himself. Bob's pocket sec will figure out the
best time, and will ask Bob for confirmation; however, Bob might get tired
of always answering these confirmations. Most suits, sooner or later, end u=
p
issuing filter instructions to their secs like ``always accept any meeting
request coming from my boss'', or ``I never want to have a meeting with
anyone
who is not in my address book'', and so on. The sec will stash all this inf=
o
in memory, and from it, we can learn quite a bit about how Bob interacts
with certain people. You can almost always tell who his superior at the
company is, and usually the members of his project or team.
(>) Shryke

(>) The learning behavior was found to be the primary reason for the
tendency of corporate employees to view their pocket secretary as an entity
rather than an object, complete with personality quirks and feelings. As th=
e
device changes the way it relates to the user, the user changes the way it
relates to the device.
(>) SocioPat

(>) This can form a real emotional bond between the user and the device. I
personally witnessed a pocket sec used to enhance the material link to a
ritual sorcery target.
(>) Jasper

The voice interpretation of a pocket secretary also turn your works into
text in real time with great accuracy. Generally, the device will only make
mistakes a real person might make, such as misspelling proper nouns, like
names. It uses context to decide among homonyms (different words that are
pronounced the same, like ``bare'' and ``bear''). It also analyzes context,
and
even inflection, to provide text formatting, such as paragraph breaks. The
pocket sec will, for example, italicize words from languages other than the
main language of the document being composed or the names of books. It also
does a good job of putting the right text in quotation marks, so you can
dictate a dialog in a fiction book without the need for retouching.

Most devices reviewed here can read back text as well, in a quite reasonabl=
e
voice. Some can even read back to you in a different language, again using
the context information to assist in the translation.

(>) A new trend is to install custom voices into your sec. I hear someone i=
s
releasing the late, lamented Euphoria's voice in a few months. Sign me up!
(>) Igni

Apart from its ``voice'' the pocket secretary can also communicate to you
with
sound. Most have advanced alarm abilities and can play CD-quality music. Th=
e
screen is the other primary method of communicating to the user. The curren=
t
generation of machines uses full color ruthenium grids for display screens,
at densities from 470 to 940 dots per centimeter.

(>) For you Yanks, that's about 1200 to 2400 dpi.
(>) Igni

Storage

Available in a wide range of internal storage capacities, most pocket
secretaries can also use external storage. Some contain one or more slots
for standard 1,000Mp optical data chip cartridges [sr3.288]. Other units,
either in addition to or in place of standard chip ports, have moved to the
Dataspike public standard, invented in 2056 by Fuchi and now controlled by
the International Standards Organization. The latest version of this
standard houses 1,000Mp of storage into a spike with the same dimensions as
a credstick. Dataspike readers, designed with pocket electronics in mind,
can read both credsticks and dataspikes, allowing two critical components o=
f
a pocket secretary to be combined into the same physical space.

Media

To complete their functionality, the vast majority of pocket secretaries
come complete with multimedia capabilities. Most have at least one decent
speaker, usually two, as well as a standard jack for headphones or external
speakers. Sound output is of CD quality, and many support surround sound,
though this requires external speakers. Sound may also be recorded at CD
quality from a built-in microphone or external source, taking up one
megapulse per minute [sb.99].

Many models reviewed here contain built-in digital photo systems. The same
camera used for vidphone communication is pointed at the subject, and you
can see the image live on the screen. The quality of the image is
adjustable, depending on how much storage you wish to use per photo. In
standard mode, you can fit 60 photos per megapulse [sr3.299].

The camera can play back full-screen video at 30 frames per second. Units
that support vidphone communication can record video as well (including
vidphone calls). Though not as good as a dedicated video recorder, image
quality of recordings made by the pocket sec is adequate. Standard video
requires one megapulse per minute in addition to the storage used by any
sound recorded with the video [sb.99].

Pocket secretaries cannot directly display trideo, but can be used to drive
external trideo displays, during presentations, for example.

(>) Renraku tried to market a pocket sec that had a simsense player in it
last year. Failed miserably. I guess it was just to big.
(>) Steelseed

(>) Nope. It failed because most pocket secs are bought by corps, who give
them to their suits. Corps don't want their suits braindancing, they want
'em on the real world, making money.
(>) Igni

Form

Like most products, the various brands of pocket secretary differentiate
themselves from each other on the basis of capability, features and cost;
however, the actual shape of a pocket secretary greatly influences who uses
it and why. Thus, shape is one of the most important product differentiator=
s
in the pocket sec market, with most corporations targeting a certain kind o=
f
user.

Pocket secs come in a wide variety of shapes and sizes, and this makes
blanket comparison of them a spotty proposition. Rather than a single
recommendation, in our final analysis, we recommend several models, based o=
n
the which model might fit the needs of a certain kind of user.

In general, pocket secs break down into a handful of types. The most common
is the ``pad'' format. These generally have no keyboard, instead relying on
stylus and voice input, and range in size from a pack of cigarettes to a
paperback book. Next is the ``book'' type, which usually has a keyboard.
These
vary greatly in size and are usually built in two sections that fold
together, one with a keyboard and one with a display screen. Others are
``phone'' models, which look mostly like cellular phones, often with a
screen
on the back. Recently, models based on a ``notebook'' design, with a dozen
or
so electronic pages that can be turned have become very popular. There are
other, more unique concepts, such as the Renraku PDS or the headset design
from Wuxing.

(>) Most people don't realize that the shape of pocket secretaries has
changed very little in over sixty years, when they were called ``personal
digital assistants''. While computers have shrunk, human beings haven't. Yo=
u
can only make a computer so small before it becomes impossible to interact
with. When you sneeze, you don't want to worry about blowing your computer
into someone's eye. The end result: more and more processing power keeps
getting pushed into the same case.
(>) Coma

``Book'' and ``notebook'' style devices usually have a detachable earpiece
which
acts as both the speaker and microphone during phone conversations (the
microphone picks up vibrations from the ear). ``Pad'' style devices either
use
a similar earpiece, or have a small arm that swings out, turning the pad
into the body of a phone handset.

Power

Pocket secretaries tend to push the envelope of consumer battery technology=
.
The current generation improves on last year's already impressive battery
life. The devices reviewed here universally host rechargeable batteries
which support 20 days of continuous use. Most users can expect their device
to run for nearly a year before a recharge is required. Phone use takes the
most power, so users who make more phone calls than average can expect to
recharge more often.

Options

This year marks an exciting evolution in the pocket secretary arena with
both Pueblo Corporate Council and Renraku releasing a thought-based
interface to their product lines. That's right, you can now think your
commands and compositions to your pocket secretary.

(>) The Pueblo systems are sweet. They are an extension of the cybercomm
link technology [ct.20] that a lot of sammies I know use.
(>) Igni

These systems require that the device be plugged into a datajack to
function, and commands must be ``thought out loud'' to be understood by the
device. This requires you to make a conscious choice to use the device,
filtering out more subconscious thoughts. In practice, it works much like
the vocal interface, including stenographic abilities. When translating
thoughts to text, the systems are a bit more error prone than the voice
systems, especially the Renraku ThoughtBook, but can be slightly faster.

As mentioned above, some units come with language translation abilities,
some in nearly real time. Software modules are available for major
languages, and you need a module for both the source and destination
language to get a translation. Systems that support this option come with
modules for English and Japanese. Other modules can be purchased for 30Y
each. Each module uses 10Mp.

Most pocket secretaries offer some sort of password protection, usually
requested when the device is made active, or sometimes before a phone call
is made. Passwords are often just text, but can also be pictures, or even
clicking patterns on the screen.

(>) And, man, is this easy to break. The ``password'' on most of these
systems
isn't really a key at all, just a dialog supposedly stopping you from
continuing. All you do is hook up a memory reader to the internal storage
and convince the dialog that it has been given the correct password. Most o=
f
the time, you can even see the real password in memory. To do this, you nee=
d
to crack the case open, but this isn't usually a problem.
(>) Coma

In practice, though, such password schemes are meant to deter the average
user, not real data thieves. For security conscious users, some units come
with data encryption systems which scrambles the data stored on the device.
All devices that support this can either encrypt the entire device under a
single password key, or can encrypt single files under different keys, or
both.

(>) This is more serious, but usually not by much. Most of these devices ar=
e
made to sell all over the world, and so often the key length used is to
short to make brute force attacks impractical. A good decryption utility on
a fast deck should be able to find the key in a few days.
(>) Coma

(>) Some of the higher end ones are serious drek, though. The
Attache and Correo use pretty serious algorithms, with real key lengths. Fo=
r
these you might be better off using real cryptanalysis or a rubber hose
attack.
(>) Shryke

(>) A what?
(>) Myra

(>) It means beating, blackmailing or bribing the key out of someone who
knows it. This is almost always the fastest way to decrypt strong
encryption. The disadvantage is that the owner of the data then knows you
have it.
(>) Steelseed

(>) Not always. Don't forget the decker's maxim: people are stupid. I once
got access to all the data on an encrypted an Attache because the drekwit I
swiped it from had entered the key, then left the thing running without
clearing the key. He also turned off the fragging timer that would
automatically clear the key every few hours. People also tell their
passwords to people, like secretaries, kids, lovers, spouses. Some even
write it down somewhere.
(>) Shepherd

(>) There really are some stupid fraggers out there. One thing suits do is
pick really dumb-ass passwords. Try birthdays, anniversaries, the names of
kids, lovers, spouses, pets. Even keyboard patterns like ``qwerty'' and
``fred''. Groove into the corp culture for hints. I've dug out about fifty
passwords from Renraku mid-level suits, and honest to God, 10 of them used
the same word for their password: ``blowjob''.
(>) Deathbloom

(>) Anybody heard of magic? A mind probe spell can pull a key out in no
time.
(>) Jasper

(>) I wouldn't know, but surveillance works well, and doesn't give away tha=
t
you know the key. It's easier to surveil pocket sec passwords, because
people use them when they are on the move, out in the open. Know your
targets, people.
(>) Looky Lou

(>) And avoid making these mistakes yourself.
(>) Starch

Some devices also encrypt the device's phone communications. This kind of
protection is much more expensive, but prevents people from understanding
your conversations. Usually, this kind of protection uses public key
encryption, functioning nearly invisibly. You do not need to enter a
password for these kind of systems, as the phone has a built in and changin=
g
key system. For encrypted phone communications, both parties must be using
the same encryption system.

(>) This is harder to deal with, because the phone generates a public and
private key for each phone call, then negotiates with system on the other
end of the line, exchanging public keys. If you can't decode it with a
decrypt or cryptanalysis, your only hope is to record the transmission
and brute-force it. Naturally, the short key length of most pocket secs
works here as well, which helps.
(>) Coma

(>) Why not just insert a fake public key into the transmission?
(>) Myra

(>) Even assuming you could alter the signal at the right time, this
wouldn't work. The way public key systems work, this would prevent at least
one of the parties from properly decrypting the signal. The result would be
static. If you want to prevent the conversation from occurring, this would
be a good tactic, though.
(>) Coma

(>) There is another kind security that pocket secs have: protection agains=
t
signal jamming. Most have rudimentary ECCM systems, but some have more
sophisticated hardware.
(>) Taco

MODELS

Ares Attache
Form: Notebook Storage: 300Mp Cost: 20,650Y Score: 91

The leather bound portfolio unzips to reveal twelve full page, double-sided
sheets of stiff electronic ``paper'', each about a millimeter thick. The
last
page is touch sensitive and can be configured to operate as a keyboard, if
desired. Otherwise, a stylus, inserted into the top of the spine, provides
the primary manual interface. The bottom spine of the portfolio contains a
Dataspike port, while the inside back cover contains slots for two standar=
d
optical chips and a phone earpiece. An arm with the camera at the top of th=
e
book will swing out and up.

The Attache features good communication security and the strongest data
encryption of the devices we reviewed. These features cost though, making
the device one of the priciest. Of the notebooks we tested, the Attache
rated the highest, and it certainly wins big for style.

Ares SecComm
Form: Phone Storage: 75Mp Cost: 12,950Y Score: 88
Ares SecComm Executive
Form: Phone Storage: 150Mp Cost: 14,500Y Score: 89

These two phone systems differ from each other only in the amount of memory
they contain and the addition of a optical chip port in the Executive model=
.
Both phones feature the same communications security of the Attache and
include a less robust, but satisfactory data encryption system.

Both systems are hampered by reliance on voice as the primary interface,
featuring no stylus or keyboard, though the screen is touch sensitive. Also=
,
neither can turn your text into speech, instead forcing you to read from a
small screen where the keypad of the phone should be.

Though these lacks prevent us from recommending it as a general purpose
pocket secretary, Ares has targeted this device more as an advanced, secure
phone, with extra data capabilities. In this arena, it heads the pack.

Cross Applied Technologies TiMax-50
Form: Watch Storage: 50Mp Cost: 750Y Score: 80

In spite of having nearly no data input abilities, this wrist phone
qualifies as pocket secretary, just barely. The TiMax is meant mostly as a
data display system, combined with wrist phone abilities. Users must enter
data on a personal computer or cyberdeck, then transfer the data to the
watch. The watch features a number of buttons used to scroll through data
and change the way it is displayed. Though it features none of the standard
multi-media capabilities, the watch does accept a limited range of voice
commands, including a well thought out search system. Naturally, this devic=
e
is to small to have chip ports.

Targeted mostly at the Japanese ``gadget'' market, this device lacks the
storage to be useful, even given its reduced abilities.

(>) I know some riggers who love this baby.
(>) Avalaros

Cumbre Systemas Correo
Form: Pad Storage: 200Mp Cost: 84,650Y Score: 75

Though only available to high security and military markets, Cumbre Systema=
s
submitted this device, so we tested it.

(>) Sounds like some of your ``coaching'' was done here, Courtesan.
(>) Myra

(>) Big time. This is a pure PR move. Cumbre wants to flex. It should go
without saying that Cumbre Systemas is Aztechnology's consumer electronics
label.
(>) Courtesan

The Correo hosts communication encryption hardware that, not surprisingly
for
military hardware, far surpasses any of the other systems we reviewed. It's
data encryption is also superior, matching that of the Ares Attache. The
Correo is a stylus-based system that has a Dataspike port and a standard
chip port.

Like other Cumbre systems, the phone is a distinct entity from the main bod=
y
of the secretary; however, the Correo includes a phone unit, unlike it's
civilian brothers.

Cumbre Systemas Nut-100
Form: Pad Storage: 100Mp Cost: 750Y Score: 91
Cumbre Systemas Nut-200
Form: Pad Storage: 200Mp Cost: 2,300Y Score: 90

The cost for these units is much lower than other devices with similar
features, because these devices do not come with phones. Instead, they are
meant to tightly integrate with all brands of cellular phone. Each comes
with a stylus-based interface and a Dataspike reader. Following Ares' lead=
,
the difference in between the two Nut systems is that one has an optical
chip port and twice the memory.

Though solid pieces of equipment, the only feature which makes the Nut
systems stand out is their ability to work with third party phones.

Mitsuhama IQ-200
Form: Book Storage: 200Mp Cost: 3,050Y Score: 91
Mitsuhama IQ-350
Form: Book Storage: 350Mp Cost: 7,050Y Score: 91
Mitsuhama IQ-500
Form: Book Storage: 500Mp Cost: 10,050Y Score: 91

This line features a unique design and a wide range of storage capacity.
Shaped like keyboard which can fold in half, the screen of the IQ pulls out
from the back of the two sections. When fully extended the screen meshes
together for a seamless look. The result is a very small unit which unfolds
to provide one of the largest keyboards in the pocket secretary arena. At
the bottom of the hinge is a Dataspike port and an optical chip can be sli=
d
into each side.

Unfortunately, the IQ is marred by the inability to draw on the screen with
a stylus. Instead a strange joystick nubbin sticks out from the keys on the
left side for screen tracking. Though a first rate machine in every other
respect, the lack of stylus is significant enough to prevent our
recommendation of it as a general use pocket secretary.

Novatech Soren
Form: Book Storage: 200Mp Cost: 4,000Y Score: 97

Novatech first entry into the pocket secretary field, the Soren has roared
onto the scene with first rate performance and a classy look. The Soren is
consciously meant to look from the outside like a metal cigarette case
(available in silver, gold and gunmetal), monogrammed if desired. Opening
the unit reveals one side to be a screen, and the other a small keyboard. O=
n
the right of the screen, a small panel will tilt open slightly to hold a
cred stick or data spike. Just below this, rests a space for the phone
earpiece. A small stylus is tucked into the hinge of the case. The camera
pops out on a small turret from the other side of the hinge.

In all, our judges docked the Soren points only for its lack of an optical
chip port and slightly small screen. It clearly leads the pack for general
purpose pocket secretaries.

Polyglot Amber
Form: Pad Storage: 50Mp Cost: 725Y Score: 92
Polyglot Ruby
Form: Pad Storage: 75Mp Cost: 1,175Y Score: 92
Polyglot Jade
Form: Pad Storage: 130Mp Cost: 2,000Y Score: 95

These systems from Polyglot (owned by Yamatetsu) possess superior language
translation abilities (see ``Options'' above), and are targeted primarily a=
t
the Far East. These systems use the stylus as their only manual interface,
and contain the best support for written Japanese that we tested. All three
systems use identical chassis, differing only the amount of memory they
contain. Each have a Dataspike port, an optical chip port, and store a
double ended stylus in the right side. This stylus boasts a standard pen ti=
p
on one side, and flat, calligraphic tip on the other. It is also the most
comfortable stylus we tested. A microphone for phone communication slides
straight down on an arm from the center of the back. The camera disconnects=
,

and includes a clip to hold it in place.

Unless you only want language translation, stick with the Jade model. The
others cost less, but don't contain enough memory to perform both
translation and other tasks.

(>) Yamatetsu (and some of the other corps) cut costs in their design by
completely removing any ECCM from their systems. This is not widely
advertised, but might make a big difference to you.
(>) Fecundity

Pueblo Empath
Form: Pad Storage: 190Mp Cost: 5,000Y Score: 96
Pueblo PSILock
Form: Pad Storage: 250Mp Cost: 12,700Y Score: 93

The thought-based interface of these models provided the most pleasant
surprise
in our testing. Even though it is not yet perfect, we cannot see any
meaningful way to improve it, with the exception of making it less
expensive.

The two models are identical in appearance, sporting a Dataspike port and =
a
standard optical ship port. These devices use the stylus as their only
manual interface, but we almost never used ours, preferring thought control=
.
(The stylus is much easier when drawing, however.) The more advanced PSILoc=
k
system contains more memory as well as very good data encryption and decent
communication protection.

The Empath is a close second to the Soren on our pick list, with only its
cost preventing it from beating out the Soren. The PSILock is equally
impressive, but even more expensive.

Renraku Buyout
Form: Book Storage: 150Mp Cost: 3,050Y Score: 94

One of many of Renraku's varied line of pocket secretaries, this device is
essentially just a relabeled version of the most popular pocket sec of all
time, the Fuchi Pente. As can be inferred from the none-to-subtle name,
Renraku acquired the rights to the design during the recent liquidation of
Fuchi.

With much of the same lineage, the Buyout shares many features with the
Soren. The Buyout is a bit bigger, but still based on the same folding
principle as the Soren. In addition to its Dataspike port, it does contain
an optical chip jack. It comes in only one memory configuration, but the
Shiawase Archons are the same device with slightly different storage
sizes.

In spite of the new name, neither the design of this device, nor its
interface has changed much in the past two years. Granted, the Pente led th=
e
industry during those two years, but it is now slightly behind its
competition.

Renraku Personal Data System (PDS)
Form: Jack plug Storage: 50Mp Cost: 750Y Score: 86

This experimental design looks unlike any other pocket secretary we've seen=
.
The PDS consists of two main pieces, connected by a thin, strong, wire. The
main piece looks very much like one of the jack plugs used to prevent grime
from accumulating in a datajack while not in use. In fact, this piece is
meant to plug directly into a datajack and display information onto a data
link or other cyber information system. The other end is an
earpiece/microphone.

The PDS can accept rudimentary cybernetic commands, but is not capable of
the ``thought-to-text'' features of the Pueblo systems. Data input is also
problematic, but the PDS is designed to work with data already in headware
memory. The PDS was the least cumbersome of the devices we tested and hard
to spot in use. For people with lots of headware, this device is probably
useful only for its phone system. Those without large amounts of headware
(in particular, an encephalon) might gain some use out of the system's data
display abilities.

Renraku WorkBook
Form: Book Storage: 100Mp Cost: 2,000Y Score: 93

About the size of a paperback book, the WorkBook has long been the model
that
people think of when they hear the words ``pocket secretary''. A venerable
design got some new style this year, replacing the keyboard with a touch
screen that can be configured to display various styles of keyboard or data
instead. The book opens along its long axis into revealing two screens
inside. The touch screen is on the right, but the system can be turned so
that the touch screen orients more like the keyboard on a laptop computer.

The system contains one Dataspike port (in the bottom of the hinge), but n=
o
chip ports. The phone earpiece pulls out of the bottom edge of the book,
while the camera pops out on a turret from the from top of the hinge. A
stylus slides into the outside edge. The WorkBook is one of the most durabl=
e
devices we tested, able to survive drops onto concrete from more than five
meters.

Long the workhorse of the pocket sec industry, the WorkBook is starting to
show its age. The new configurable touch pad is wonderful, however, and ads
a breath of new life to this model.

Renraku WorkBook Pro
Form: Notebook Storage: 700Mp Cost: 14,000Y Score: 87
Renraku ThoughtBook
Form: Notebook Storage: 700Mp Cost: 15,150Y Score: 87

Though not as stylish or secure as the Attache, the WorkBook Pro is smaller
(more like a lab notebook), much more rugged, cheaper and contains over
twice the storage, giving the WorkBook Pro the most memory of any of the
models we tested. Cased in hard plastic are five double sided, rigid
electronic ``pages'', much like those in the Attache, but about 50% thicker=
.
The inside back cover of the case holds a large, configurable touch pad,
just like that in the WorkBook, but twice as large.

Other accessories, too, are clones of those in the WorkBook, including the
Dataspike port. The Pro version, however, adds three standard optical chip
ports in the inner front cover.

While a solid performer, the WorkBook Pro needs more pages, and lower
cost, even if it means reducing the WorkBook Pro's generous storage.

The ThoughtBook is a WorkBook Pro with Renraku's thought-based interface
added in. If you need thought-based interface, we recommend staying with th=
e
Pueblo devices. The ThoughtBook is an admirable try, but no where near the
level of the other thought products.

Shiawase Archon-100
Form: Book Storage: 100Mp Cost: 2,100Y Score: 93
Shiawase Archon-200
Form: Book Storage: 100Mp Cost: 2,100Y Score: 93

Replacing Shiawase's hideous ``clamshell'' models of last year are more
legacies from the dismantling of Fuchi. These systems are also relabeled
Fuchi Pente models, making them identical to the Buyout, but for difference=
s
in memory configuration.

The Archons score a point lower than the Buyout, due to some problems we ha=
d
with technical support.

Ubertragen Technologies Munin
Form: Book Storage: 100Mp Cost: 2,050Y Score: 93

Ubertragen is a joint venture between Renraku and Saeder-Krupp, targeting
the European market. Though more streamlined in appearance (and available i=
n
custom colors and textures), the Munin is a functional clone of the
Renraku WorkBook, with the addition of standard optical chip port.

Wuxing LBT
Form: Headset Storage: 50Mp Cost: 750Y Score: 89

This strange looking device is targeted at markets which require hands free
operations, such as cab drivers, pilots, ambulance crew, mechanics, even
commuters. The LBT is a headset device with a microphone and a heads up
display which is suspended like a lens in front of the eye. The camera is
connected above the opposite ear. Data input is done entirely by voice, or
from an external system. Wuxing claims that the LBT is often plugged into a
vehicle's computer, and will integrate with it, but we did not test this.

This system cannot send vidphone signals, but can receive them. It does not
contain any ports for external storage. The interface is Spartan, but allow=
s
hands free navigation with voice command better than any other device we
tested.

(>) Ten points to anyone who can find out what LBT means.
(>) Igni

Though somewhat under-powered, we found this system to operate hands free
very well. We also appreciated the design of the headgear, which is quite
comfortable (even after long periods) and contains a number of extra straps
and clips to hold extra devices, like a flashlight.

GAME INFORMATION

Data Comm Street
Name Conc. Weight Mp ECCM Encr. Encr. Cost Index Legal
Ares Attache 2 1.5 300 3 6 3 20,700Y 2.5 6P-U
Ares SecComm 3 1.0 75 3 3 3 12,950Y 2 7P-U
Ares SecComm Executive 3 1.0 150 3 3 3 14,500Y 2 7P-U
Cross TiMax-50 8 0.25 50 750Y 0.75 Legal
Cumbre Systemas Correo 7 0.25 200 6 6 6 84,650Y 4 3-W
Cumbre Systemas Nut-100 7 0.25 100 750Y 0.75 Legal
Cumbre Systemas Nut-200 7 0.25 200 2,300Y 0.75 Legal
Mitsuhama IQ-200 5 0.25 200 3,100Y 0.75 Legal
Mitsuhama IQ-350 5 0.25 350 1 7,100Y 0.75 Legal
Mitsuhama IQ-500 5 0.25 500 1 10,100Y 0.75 Legal
Novatech Soren 7 0.5 200 1 4,000Y 0.75 Legal
Polyglot Amber 7 0.25 50 725Y 0.75 Legal
Polyglot Jade 7 0.25 130 2,000Y 0.75 Legal
Polyglot Ruby 7 0.25 75 1,175Y 0.75 Legal
Pueblo Empath 7 0.25 190 1 5,000Y 1 Legal
Pueblo PSILock 7 0.25 250 1 5 2 12,700Y 1 8P-U
Renraku Buyout 5 0.3 150 1 3,050Y 0.75 Legal
Renraku PDS 8 0.25 50 750Y 0.75 Legal
Renraku ThoughtBook 2 1.0 700 1 15,150Y 0.75 Legal
Renraku WorkBook 3 0.5 100 1 2,000Y 0.75 Legal
Renraku WorkBook Pro 2 1.0 700 1 14,150Y 0.75 Legal
Shiawase Archon-100 5 0.3 100 1 1 2,100Y 0.75 Legal
Shiawase Archon-200 5 0.3 200 1 1 4,100Y 0.75 Legal
Ubertragen Munin 3 0.5 100 1 2,050Y 0.75 Legal
Wuxing LBT 6 0.25 50 750Y 0.75 Legal
Message no. 2
From: Gurth <gurth@******.NL>
Subject: Re: [Stuff] Pocket Secretaries (first draft)
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1998 11:58:42 +0200
According to Wordman, at 1:23 on 28 Sep 98, the word on the street was...

> Stylus control involves drawing and ``gesturing'' directly on the screen
> with a pen-like object that comes with (and stored within) the device.
> Stylus control is coupled with real-time handwriting recognition,
> translating what you write into digital symbols. Stylus control is
> useful for drawing applications, but is used most often to input
> non-roman languages, especially Japanese.

You may want to mention the use of on-screen icons that you touch with the
stylus to perform standard functions. It appears from text that you
intended that, but it may be best to explicitly mention it -- most
consumer test reports I've read assume the reader is totally new to the
concepts behind item being reviewed, so something like that should be
mentioned, IMHO.

[big snip]

> As mentioned above, some units come with language translation abilities,
> some in nearly real time. Software modules are available for major
> languages, and you need a module for both the source and destination
> language to get a translation. Systems that support this option come with
> modules for English and Japanese. Other modules can be purchased for 30Y
> each. Each module uses 10Mp.

I feel the prices should be based on those for language skillsofts (SR3 p.
295), because otherwise this is WAY cheap compared to getting a language
skill you can use yourself.

[more snip]

> (>) This is more serious, but usually not by much. Most of these devices are
> made to sell all over the world, and so often the key length used is to
> short to make brute force attacks impractical.

A bit of an awkward sentence, I feel. How about "... and so, often the key
length used is short enough to make brute force attacks practical." It
gets rid of the double negative, and so is a bit easier to understand.

[rest snipped]

> GAME INFORMATION
>
> Data Comm Street
> Name Conc. Weight Mp ECCM Encr. Encr. Cost Index Legal
> Ares Attache 2 1.5 300 3 6 3 20,700Y 2.5 6P-U

You may also want to add in ratings for language skills these things have.
Also, is there any particular formula you used to calculate the costs, or
did you just pick some that looked nice?

--
Gurth@******.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/index.html
"Nobody's going to murder anyone here even if it means I have to
kill someone!" --Kane, detective/rigger
-> NERPS Project Leader * ShadowRN GridSec * Unofficial Shadowrun Guru <-
-> The Plastic Warriors Page: http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/plastic.html <-
-> The New Character Mortuary: http://www.electricferret.com/mortuary/ <-

GC3.1: GAT/! d-(dpu) s:- !a>? C+(++)@ U P L E? W(++) N o? K- w+ O V? PS+
PE Y PGP- t(+) 5++ X++ R+++>$ tv+(++) b++@ DI? D+ G(++) e h! !r(---) y?
Incubated into the First Church of the Sqooshy Ball, 21-05-1998
Message no. 3
From: Wordman <wordman@*******.COM>
Subject: Re: [Stuff] Pocket Secretaries (first draft)
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1998 09:09:23 -0400
Gurth wrote:
>I feel the prices should be based on those for language skillsofts (SR3 p.
>295), because otherwise this is WAY cheap compared to getting a language
>skill you can use yourself.

Good point. I'm thinking maybe the same storage for, like, half the cost?
They shouldn't cost exactly the same, since they are not as useful.

>A bit of an awkward sentence, I feel. How about "... and so, often the key
>length used is short enough to make brute force attacks practical." It
>gets rid of the double negative, and so is a bit easier to understand.

We have no reason to disbelieve that this may or may not be true at this
time. :-).

>You may also want to add in ratings for language skills these things have.

Easily done.

>Also, is there any particular formula you used to calculate the costs, or
>did you just pick some that looked nice?

The formula is based on the memory cost of the machine (20Y * Mp), which
appears to be how they arrived at the price of the standard pocket secretary
in SR3 (2,000Y). Added to this are the data and communication encryption
costs from the tables in SR3. Prices are also adjusted by the ECCM rules.
SR3 says that all comm devices have ECCM 1, with each extra level costing
1,000Y. Removing ECCM entirely reduces the base cost of the device by 25%.
Then I did a small amount of tweaking, but not much. Do you think this
should be spelled out in the "Game Information" section?

Wordman
Message no. 4
From: Gurth <gurth@******.NL>
Subject: Re: [Stuff] Pocket Secretaries (first draft)
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1998 19:31:53 +0200
According to Wordman, at 9:09 on 28 Sep 98, the word on the street was...

> >I feel the prices should be based on those for language skillsofts (SR3 p.
> >295), because otherwise this is WAY cheap compared to getting a language
> >skill you can use yourself.
>
> Good point. I'm thinking maybe the same storage for, like, half the cost?

What I figure is that these things need to have _two_ languages at least,
so they can translate from one to the other and back. (More is optional,
of course). Since it wouldn't require the human-friendly interface
linugasofts probably have, I'd say halve (or maybe quarter) the cost for
each individual language, but then multiply by the number of languages in
the PS.

> >You may also want to add in ratings for language skills these things have.
>
> Easily done.

Yep, but it's handy when you want to know just how well a translation
comes out.

> >Also, is there any particular formula you used to calculate the costs, or
> >did you just pick some that looked nice?
>
> The formula is based on the memory cost of the machine (20Y * Mp), which
> appears to be how they arrived at the price of the standard pocket secretary
> in SR3 (2,000Y). Added to this are the data and communication encryption
> costs from the tables in SR3. Prices are also adjusted by the ECCM rules.
> SR3 says that all comm devices have ECCM 1, with each extra level costing
> 1,000Y. Removing ECCM entirely reduces the base cost of the device by 25%.
> Then I did a small amount of tweaking, but not much.

That's about what I figured.

> Do you think this should be spelled out in the "Game Information"
> section?

Yes, if only to allow people to easily design their own pocket secretaries
and come up with more or less equal costs to yours. I know that I prefer a
ready-made design system over having to reverse-engineer existing data
myself.

--
Gurth@******.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/index.html
"Nobody's going to murder anyone here even if it means I have to
kill someone!" --Kane, detective/rigger
-> NERPS Project Leader * ShadowRN GridSec * Unofficial Shadowrun Guru <-
-> The Plastic Warriors Page: http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/plastic.html <-
-> The New Character Mortuary: http://www.electricferret.com/mortuary/ <-

GC3.1: GAT/! d-(dpu) s:- !a>? C+(++)@ U P L E? W(++) N o? K- w+ O V? PS+
PE Y PGP- t(+) 5++ X++ R+++>$ tv+(++) b++@ DI? D+ G(++) e h! !r(---) y?
Incubated into the First Church of the Sqooshy Ball, 21-05-1998
Message no. 5
From: Wordman <wordman@*******.COM>
Subject: Re: [Stuff] Pocket Secretaries (first draft)
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1998 20:42:46 -0400
>According to Wordman, at 9:09 on 28 Sep 98, the word on the street was...
>> Good point. I'm thinking maybe the same storage for, like, half the cost?
>
>What I figure is that these things need to have _two_ languages at least,
>so they can translate from one to the other and back.

Yup. I mention this in the text. Maybe I need to call a little more
attention to it.


>> >You may also want to add in ratings for language skills these things have.
>>
>> Easily done.
>
>Yep, but it's handy when you want to know just how well a translation
>comes out.

Sorry. By "easily done", I meant, "it will be easy for me to add this into
the revision".

>> Do you think this should be spelled out in the "Game Information"
>> section?
>
>Yes, if only to allow people to easily design their own pocket secretaries
>and come up with more or less equal costs to yours.

Will do.

Wordman
Message no. 6
From: Tomus Cone <brother_1@*******.COM>
Subject: Re: [Stuff] Pocket Secretaries (first draft)
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1998 19:59:15 PDT
The only thing about these that I felt was neglected, from a deckers
point of view, is someone mentioning that they're like winking SANs, and
that you can retrieve data from them via the matrix.

I'd like to offer the name of
Brother-1

______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
Message no. 7
From: Wordman <wordman@*******.COM>
Subject: Re: [Stuff] Pocket Secretaries (first draft)
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1998 09:09:38 -0400
>The only thing about these that I felt was neglected, from a deckers
>point of view, is someone mentioning that they're like winking SANs, and
>that you can retrieve data from them via the matrix.

Hmm. I hadn't considered that. Do you really think they would be open to
viewing from the Matrix (when they were connected to it, of course). Seems
like most users would not want this. I know I wouldn't. I wouldn't want to
risk my personal data being snooped from the Matrix.

Wordman
Message no. 8
From: Gurth <gurth@******.NL>
Subject: Re: [Stuff] Pocket Secretaries (first draft)
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1998 19:50:19 +0200
According to Wordman, at 9:09 on 29 Sep 98, the word on the street was...

> Hmm. I hadn't considered that. Do you really think they would be open to
> viewing from the Matrix (when they were connected to it, of course). Seems
> like most users would not want this. I know I wouldn't. I wouldn't want to
> risk my personal data being snooped from the Matrix.

I think these things would be guarded in some way, like only "opening" to
receive data (at which time a decker could get in, theoretically) when
they _need_ to.

--
Gurth@******.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/index.html
"Nobody's going to murder anyone here even if it means I have to
kill someone!" --Kane, detective/rigger
-> NERPS Project Leader * ShadowRN GridSec * Unofficial Shadowrun Guru <-
-> The Plastic Warriors Page: http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/plastic.html <-
-> The New Character Mortuary: http://www.electricferret.com/mortuary/ <-

GC3.1: GAT/! d-(dpu) s:- !a>? C+(++)@ U P L E? W(++) N o? K- w+ O V? PS+
PE Y PGP- t(+) 5++ X++ R+++>$ tv+(++) b++@ DI? D+ G(++) e h! !r(---) y?
Incubated into the First Church of the Sqooshy Ball, 21-05-1998
Message no. 9
From: Fixer <fixer@*******.TLH.FL.US>
Subject: Re: [Stuff] Pocket Secretaries (first draft)
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1998 14:29:25 -0400
On Tue, 29 Sep 1998, Gurth wrote:

->According to Wordman, at 9:09 on 29 Sep 98, the word on the street was...
->
->> Hmm. I hadn't considered that. Do you really think they would be open to
->> viewing from the Matrix (when they were connected to it, of course). Seems
->> like most users would not want this. I know I wouldn't. I wouldn't want to
->> risk my personal data being snooped from the Matrix.
->
->I think these things would be guarded in some way, like only "opening" to
->receive data (at which time a decker could get in, theoretically) when
->they _need_ to.

How about the one-directional datalines as put forth in NAGRL?
One for incoming and one for outgoing data? In addition, for security
reasons (if I designed the system), the matrix LTG for a pocket secretary
would be 'unstable' in that each time a pocket secretary or cellphone was
activated, it was given a new LTG number (think modern day pagers where
you have one number you dial in on and then type in a PIN to get a
specific pager. Doing that in reverse.). Unless you stayed connected for
a long period of time, you'd be safe using it and not being hacked by
deckers. In addition, if a decker followed the data 'upstream' to find
the phone, it'd be on a one-directional OUTGOING dataline the decker
couldn't transverse (following the data downstream would take them into
the secretary, but be unable to get data out, unless they found the
outgoing dataline too...).

Fixer --------------} The easy I do before breakfast,
the difficult I do all day long,
the impossible only during the week,
and miracles performed on an as-needed basis....

Now tell me, what was your problem?
Message no. 10
From: Tomus Cone <brother_1@*******.COM>
Subject: Re: [Stuff] Pocket Secretaries (first draft)
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1998 13:03:01 PDT
>>The only thing about these that I felt was neglected,
>
>Do you really think they would be open to viewing from the Matrix
>(when they were connected to it, of course). Seems
>like most users would not want this. I know I wouldn't.

If a pocket sec can download info from the matrix, and I've always
thought it could, than yes. I'd imagine some encryption would protect
some of the high end products, but MOST people don't have to worry about
deckers. If you're randomly hit, it's like being mugged. If you're
targeted, you're big enough to be a target, and can probably afford the
extra encryption and such. Plus, I think that in a pocket sec it would
be easier to notice the matrix connection staying open or what not,
maybe a panicbutton to kill all data present.



______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
Message no. 11
From: Tomus Cone <brother_1@*******.COM>
Subject: Re: [Stuff] Pocket Secretaries (first draft)
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1998 13:16:35 PDT
> How about the one-directional datalines as put forth in >NAGRL?
One for incoming and one for outgoing data? In addition, for >security
reasons (if I designed the system), the matrix LTG for a >pocket
secretary would be 'unstable' in that each time a pocket >secretary or
cellphone was activated, it was given a new LTG number >Unless you
stayed connected for a long period of time, you'd be safe >using it and
not being hacked by
>deckers.

No one said it would be EASY. I like both of these ideas. Once the
decker is in the system it's practically homefree, grab the data and go.
Decker actions take mere moments to pull off. IF they know where the SAN
is gonna be (who assigns the LTG numbers?) it should take them seconds
to get what they need and get out.


The trick here is overcoming the I/O lines. Don't know quite how I'd
pull that off, maybe the use of some frames, or wait it out 'til a
connection pops up. Maybe the owner has a routine upload/download time?
Hope he does it in the right order.

>In addition, if a decker followed the data 'upstream' to find the
>phone, it'd be on a one-directional OUTGOING dataline the decker
>couldn't transverse (following the data downstream would take them
>into the secretary, but be unable to get data out, unless they found
>the outgoing dataline too...).
>
>Fixer

Brother-1


______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
Message no. 12
From: Wordman <wordman@*******.COM>
Subject: Re: [Stuff] Pocket Secretaries (first draft)
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1998 18:58:09 -0400
[snip conversation about hacking into secs]

Technically, phone conversations move over the Matrix, but I don't think it
is to much of a stretch to say that when using a pocket sec in "phone mode",
the data parts of the sec are cut off. (Hmm, although saying this, then
allowing recording of phone conversations doesn't work very well.) In any
case, during a phone call, I don't think there should be opportunity to deck
into a phone. Only when it is actually connected through its data port.
Unfortunately, I really can't think of a way to justify this. Seems like
you'd be open even during a phone call.

A way out of the whole situation might be this: a pocket sec just doesn't
have the bandwidth to allow a decker inside it. The decker might be able to
issue it commands, but not much else. A pocket sec could easily be built not
to accept commands from the outside world. Consider a similar example: you
have a maglock on a door wired to the Matrix. It is a low bandwidth
connection as well, so a decker can issue it commands, but not really deck
inside its electronics. What you can do to the lock depends entirely on what
kind of Matrix commands it is built to accept. I can see a brand of locks
that could be ordered to open and close from a "central command post". A
decker could issue "lock" and "unlock" commands to the lock. But I can
also
see the lock being made so that all it does over the Matrix is report on if
it is locked or not. The "central command post" can check on its state, but
to actually lock or unlock it, they would need to send someone to do it
manually. In this case, a decker wouldn't be able to send "lock" or
"unlock"
commands, just "are your locked?". Pocket secs would fall into this latter
category, I feel. They wouldn't be controllable over the Matrix.

Wordman
Message no. 13
From: Bahwi Malistyr <bahwi@************.COM>
Subject: Re: [Stuff] Pocket Secretaries (first draft)
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1998 19:50:50 -0500
Okay, I'll say something. I am basing my views on reality. Enjoy.

I view the Matrix as a new type of internet. What allows deckers
into the system would be the equivalent of telnetd. This would not
normally be in a pocket secratary. The deckers would have to find
another way in. Also, I would like a pocket secratary with only two
ports, one to receive data and one to send data. Also the OS of the
pocket secratary would normally only accecpt commands from the
screen and from the keyboard, if any. Hacking into one would
depend on the program running and controlling the ports, most
likely this would be impossible, but not always. The most would be
crashing the program and interfering with the program. You would
also have to destroy the connection then move yourself there for it
to work if the port was in use, and the system may notice it. Also,
as has been said, the pocket secratary would have little bandwidth
without an upgrade, as it would not be a replacement for an actual
telecom, and would thus be expected to be used less on the
telecom. However, you could most likely intercept data without
interfering with the connection.
Remember, this is based on modern computers and the fact the
matrix isn't where anything is possible. This is my view of it, and
technology would have improved alot and would be different. Sorry
for the long message.

-bahwi
http://www.cityscope.net/~bahwi/home.html
bahwi@************.com bahwi@*****.com UIN: 3329836
Message no. 14
From: Bahwi Malistyr <bahwi@************.COM>
Subject: Re: [Stuff] Pocket Secretaries (first draft)
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1998 20:47:16 -0500
------- Forwarded Message Follows -------
From: "Tomus Cone" <brother_1@*******.com>

>Okay, I'll say something. I am basing my views on reality. Enjoy.

Cool. I don't, but I'm not biased against.


>What allows deckers into the system would be the equivalent of
>telnetd. This would not normally be in a pocket secratary.

I know very little about the tech involved, but a pocket secratary
AFAIK
can store and process data (quite a bit in some cases) and has
both In and
Out ports for the matrix. If only one of the ports is connected, I
would
tell a decker where to go, and it wouldn't be friendly.

>The deckers would have to find
>another way in. Also, I would like a pocket secratary with only two
>ports, one to receive data and one to send data. Also the OS of the
>pocket secratary would normally only accecpt commands from the
>screen and from the keyboard, if any.

So executable files are a no-go on a pocket sec?

>Hacking into one would
>depend on the program running and controlling the ports, most
>likely this would be impossible, but not always.

I don't know about control, but definitely the attitude of these two
ports.

>The most would be
>crashing the program and interfering with the program.

I really don't see why a decker (ok, with a small enough bandwidth)
couldn't do a read/write, then crash. :)

>You would
>also have to destroy the connection then move yourself there for it
>to work if the port was in use, and the system may notice it.

Again, I think this is a matter of bandwidth, although the time delay for
anything being moved by the owner would be significantly different.

>Also,
>as has been said, the pocket secratary would have little bandwidth
>without an upgrade, as it would not be a replacement for an actual
>telecom, and would thus be expected to be used less on the
>telecom.

One of those was 20K! It better make me lunch and do my laundry!

>This is my view of it

Gotcha.

>-bahwi


______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com

-bahwi
http://www.cityscope.net/~bahwi/home.html
bahwi@************.com bahwi@*****.com UIN: 3329836
Message no. 15
From: Bahwi Malistyr <bahwi@************.COM>
Subject: Re: [Stuff] Pocket Secretaries (first draft)
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1998 21:00:47 -0500
> I know very little about the tech involved, but a pocket secratary AFAIK
> can store and process data (quite a bit in some cases) and has both In and
> Out ports for the matrix. If only one of the ports is connected, I would
> tell a decker where to go, and it wouldn't be friendly.

Yeah, but in my view the matrix isn't just decking. It has phone and
fax and many others. Like the internet is not just web and e-mail.
This is my view of course.

> So executable files are a no-go on a pocket sec?

Oops, I said it wrong. Thanks for pointing it out. I would say it
depends on which type you have. Some would have everything built
in, and add-ons would be impossible, others would allow it and
thus would be more vulnerable. If you could get the Pocket
Secratary to take that data and save it and get the person to run it,
or load it into active memory of the pocket secratary.

> I don't know about control, but definitely the attitude of these two
> ports.

Yeah, it's my view. If you set the pocket secratary to receive a fax,
and the receive port(s) would transfer data directly to the fax
program saying that this is a fax. You can get more complicated
and have the fax say "I'm a fax" to the pocket secratary and then it
would send it to the correct program. Depends on what is decided.
I can see it either way, the program receiving directly to a port
would be less vulnerable, but it would be more beneficial to have it
where it depends on the type of information it is receiving.

> I really don't see why a decker (ok, with a small enough bandwidth)
> couldn't do a read/write, then crash. :)

It depends if the pocket secratary is going to allow it. Some may
want to send data only to programs, and the decker would have to
go through that program and tell it to read/write, not just deck in
and see a data store, unless the pocket secratary wanted to show
that.

>
> Again, I think this is a matter of bandwidth, although the time delay for
> anything being moved by the owner would be significantly different.

Yeah, that's true. It all depends on one's view of the Matrix, and
how the program is working.

Hope I didn't bring this into too much technicality, because
technically there are many many different configurations. I'm just
saying things, letting them be in the back of the minds of the
creator and letting that person decide.
-bahwi
http://www.cityscope.net/~bahwi/home.html
bahwi@************.com bahwi@*****.com UIN: 3329836
Message no. 16
From: Pete Wilson <piatro@**********.COM>
Subject: Re: [Stuff] Pocket Secretaries (first draft)
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1998 21:24:45 -0500
>Pocket Secretaries
>for NERPS: Stuff
>by Wordman
>wordman@*****.com
>

>Options
>
>This year marks an exciting evolution in the pocket secretary arena with
>both Pueblo Corporate Council and Renraku releasing a thought-based
>interface to their product lines. That's right, you can now think your
>commands and compositions to your pocket secretary.
>
>(>) The Pueblo systems are sweet. They are an extension of the cybercomm
>link technology [ct.20] that a lot of sammies I know use.
>(>) Igni
>
>These systems require that the device be plugged into a datajack to
>function, and commands must be ``thought out loud'' to be understood by the
>device. This requires you to make a conscious choice to use the device,
>filtering out more subconscious thoughts. In practice, it works much like
>the vocal interface, including stenographic abilities. When translating
>thoughts to text, the systems are a bit more error prone than the voice
>systems, especially the Renraku ThoughtBook, but can be slightly faster.
>

Do cybercomm links have these same problems? CT (page 18 in my book)
doesn't even hint at any such problems in the shadowtalk. We need a
clarification of the additional problems in traslating these signals into
text or some shadowtalk refering to the "static" or "noisy singal"
experienced with cybercomms.



>Wuxing LBT
>Form: Headset Storage: 50Mp Cost: 750Y Score: 89
>
>This strange looking device is targeted at markets which require hands free
>operations, such as cab drivers, pilots, ambulance crew, mechanics, even
>commuters. The LBT is a headset device with a microphone and a heads up
>display which is suspended like a lens in front of the eye. The camera is
>connected above the opposite ear. Data input is done entirely by voice, or
>>from an external system. Wuxing claims that the LBT is often plugged into a
>vehicle's computer, and will integrate with it, but we did not test this.
>
>This system cannot send vidphone signals, but can receive them. It does not


What is the camera for that is "connected above the opposite ear?"



>Shiawase Archon-100 5 0.3 100 1 1 2,100Y 0.75 Legal
>Shiawase Archon-200 5 0.3 200 1 1 4,100Y 0.75 Legal

In the main text you have both of these models priced at 2,100Y.


This information is going to be extremely usefull. Well done.

Piatro


P.S.

(>) Hey Courtesan, what's the deal with these "Scores" They are almost all
within a spread of 11 points. Not a big deal if we have a scale of 1 to 15
or 20, but these values differ by only a little over 10%. How are
"consumers" supposed to figure out what to buy? Then they try telling us
that they have no links to the corps. Right!!!
(>) Chaos Engineer
Message no. 17
From: Patrick Goodman <remo@***.NET>
Subject: Re: [Stuff] Pocket Secretaries (first draft)
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1998 21:46:08 -0500
>This year marks an exciting evolution in the pocket secretary arena with
>both Pueblo Corporate Council and Renraku releasing a thought-based
>interface to their product lines. That's right, you can now think your
>commands and compositions to your pocket secretary.
>
>(>) The Pueblo systems are sweet. They are an extension of the cybercomm
>link technology [ct.20] that a lot of sammies I know use.
>(>) Igni

(>) Yeah, but is it backward compatible? Can I use the cybercomm implants I
already have with the sec? I don't really need the communication side of
the unit, but the ability to check my appointment book without having to
pull the thing out of my pocket if my hands are full intrigues me.
(>) Texas 2-Step
El Paso: Never surrender. Never forget. Never forgive.

>These systems require that the device be plugged into a datajack to
>function, and commands must be ``thought out loud'' to be understood by the
>device.

(>) I guess not.
(>) Texas 2-Step
El Paso: Never surrender. Never forget. Never forgive.

>Cumbre Systemas Correo
>Form: Pad Storage: 200Mp Cost: 84,650Y Score: 75
>
>Though only available to high security and military markets, Cumbre
Systemas
>submitted this device, so we tested it.
>
>(>) Sounds like some of your ``coaching'' was done here, Courtesan.
>(>) Myra
>
>(>) Big time. This is a pure PR move. Cumbre wants to flex. It should go
>without saying that Cumbre Systemas is Aztechnology's consumer electronics
>label.
>(>) Courtesan

(>) And for that they should burn.
(>) Les Tango
Message no. 18
From: Pete Wilson <piatro@**********.COM>
Subject: Re: [Stuff] Pocket Secretaries (first draft)
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1998 22:40:45 -0500
Patrick Goodman responded:

>>(>) The Pueblo systems are sweet. They are an extension of the cybercomm
>>link technology [ct.20] that a lot of sammies I know use.
>>(>) Igni
>
>(>) Yeah, but is it backward compatible? Can I use the cybercomm implants I
>already have with the sec? I don't really need the communication side of
>the unit, but the ability to check my appointment book without having to
>pull the thing out of my pocket if my hands are full intrigues me.
>(>) Texas 2-Step
> El Paso: Never surrender. Never forget. Never forgive.
>
>>These systems require that the device be plugged into a datajack to
>>function, and commands must be ``thought out loud'' to be understood by the
>>device.
>
>(>) I guess not.
>(>) Texas 2-Step
> El Paso: Never surrender. Never forget. Never forgive.
>


(>) Another similar question. Can you access any of these comps remotely?
If you forget the sec on the hall table at home can you call it on it's
built in comm unit and retrieve/drop information into it? Any pocket sec
with this capability should be able to be checked with a cybercomm as long
as there isn't a lot of interference.
(>) Chaos Engeneer
Message no. 19
From: Tomus Cone <brother_1@*******.COM>
Subject: Re: [Stuff] Pocket Secretaries (first draft)
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1998 00:32:40 PDT
> Can you access any of these comps remotely?

Think this is getting answered in the decking line of thought. Some of
the more advanced models probably have an option like this, leaving it
slightly more vulnerable to exterior influences. Course, you could just
set up a data bomb.

>(>) Chaos Engeneer
>



______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
Message no. 20
From: Tomus Cone <brother_1@*******.COM>
Subject: Re: [Stuff] Pocket Secretaries (first draft)
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1998 00:59:51 PDT
>Yeah, but in my view the matrix isn't just decking. It has phone and
>fax and many others. Like the internet is not just web and e-mail.
>This is my view of course.

That's backed up by most every printed instance I can think of. I agree
with you on the nature of the matrix.

> I would say it depends on which type you have.

I'm inclined to leave it about there, with some of the more complex
varieties of pocket sec having more capabilities, but being more
vulnerable to matrix attack. ... Maybe some max bandwidth specs would be
useful in this endeavor.

Some would have everything built
>in, and add-ons would be impossible,

I think that if everything was built in, the mfg company would consider
the security risks and therefore others that had things added on would
be more vulnerable.

> You can get more complicated
>and have the fax say "I'm a fax"

Um... a decker could say the same thing, and then change direction from
the directed directions. :)

>it would be more beneficial to have it
>where it depends on the type of information it is receiving.

I can see certain types of information being scrutinized by the system
more heavily.

>
>> I really don't see why a decker (ok, with a small enough bandwidth)
>> couldn't do a read/write, then crash. :)
>
>It depends if the pocket secratary is going to allow it.

Security I understand... security is to be overcome. I'd have to
disagree with the above sentence.

>Some may
>want to send data only to programs,

Wouldn't it all have to go through the processor? Couldn't a decker just
go from the processor to memory (active or storage) read/write what he
wants and leave? A small bandwidth into a secure winking SAN doesn't
allow for little leaguers. You'd have to be pretty talented to pull it
off, but I think I know a decker or two that could.

>and the decker would have to
>go through that program and tell it to read/write, not just deck in
>and see a data store, unless the pocket secratary wanted to show
>that.

At this point I'd just shoot the guy that owned the pocket sec. Save me
some time.

>Yeah, that's true. It all depends on one's view of the Matrix, and
>how the program is working.

Gotcha. We seem to be at an impasse.

>
>Hope I didn't bring this into too much technicality, because
>technically there are many many different configurations.

I'm thinking a bandwidth stat would clear things up, actually.

>-bahwi

Brother-1, decker of pocket secs.



______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about [Stuff] Pocket Secretaries (first draft), you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.