Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Thaine Lyman <CantSurf@**.NETCOM.COM>
Subject: Submission deadline???
Date: Sun, 30 Apr 1995 17:14:32 -0700
When is it coming up again? I have this bad feeling it's jumping up
awfully soon, which would make this Holly B. / Big D interview a
difficult project (considering that I still have very little idea where
Holly or Dunk have appeared in the FASA material).

I really want to do this one, but it would be MUCH easier (and better
quality) if I've got some samples of Holly's and/or D's "style" prior to
attempting to give them actual speech.

-T
Message no. 2
From: "J.D. Falk" <jdfalk@****.COM>
Subject: Re: Submission deadline???
Date: Sun, 30 Apr 1995 20:27:17 -0400
On Sun, 30 Apr 1995, Thaine Lyman wrote:

> When is it coming up again? I have this bad feeling it's jumping up
> awfully soon, which would make this Holly B. / Big D interview a
> difficult project (considering that I still have very little idea where
> Holly or Dunk have appeared in the FASA material).

This information is in the FAQ. I'll probably push it back a
month unless we get a lot of good stuff before then, but I'd really rather
not have to do so.

> I really want to do this one, but it would be MUCH easier (and better
> quality) if I've got some samples of Holly's and/or D's "style" prior to
> attempting to give them actual speech.

As I recall, there isn't much -- from little I recall, Dunklezahn
is usually extremely short and to the point, while still managing to
sound extremely urbane.

-------------========== J.D. Falk <jdfalk@****.com> =========-------------
| NERPS Project Leader (Editor & General Motivator), Keeper of the FAQ |
--------========== http://www.cais.com/jdfalk/home.html ==========--------

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Submission deadline???, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.

Thwap!