From:	"Robert A. Hayden" <hayden@*******.MANKATO.MSUS.EDU>
Subject:	Re: CLubs
Date:	Sat, 2 Oct 1993 23:10:45 -0500

On Fri, 1 Oct 1993, Jason Carter, Nightstalker wrote:

> I like the clubs. I just wonder if it would be possible for you to give them
> the Seattle Sourcebook treatment? It would be like even cooler if they were in
> that format.

I like the clubs too. I think writeup format is irrelevant, as long as
all of the information is included.

> I don't think anyone will care if the technical translation of warlock is
> oathbreaker. To most people warlock is just the name for a magician, most
> likely a male one at that.

I have no idea the technical origin of Warlock. By I view 'warlock' with
two definitions:

1) Male Witch
2) Servant of Evil (there is a movie called Warlock where the dude is mean)

So, I guess it boils down to, really, what the term 'witch' seems to
imply in SR, since good and evil are terms with no clear-cut definitions
any more in SR>

{[> Robert A. Hayden ____ <[} Question Authority
{[> \ /__ <]} -=-=-
{[> aq650@****.INS.CWRU.Edu \/ / <]} Finger for PGP 2.3a Public Key
{[> hayden@*******.mankato.msus.edu \/ <]} # include <std_disclaimer.h>
-=-=-=-=-=-
(GEEK CODE 1.0.1) GSS d- -p+(---) c++(++++) l++ u++ e+/* m++(*)@ s-/++
n-(---) h+(*) f+ g+ w++ t++ r++ y+(*)