From: | "Robert A. Hayden" <hayden@*******.MANKATO.MSUS.EDU> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Titles |
Date: | Mon, 25 Oct 1993 10:51:51 -0500 |
> I think just plain old 'NERPS' is fine.
> NERPS for x$ is too much, and closes off all the possibilties we might
> come up with.
How do you mean that it closes off possibilities?
____ Robert A. Hayden <=> hayden@*******.mankato.msus.edu
\ /__ -=-=-=-=- <=> -=-=-=-=-
\/ / Finger for Geek Code Info <=> Veteran of the Bermuda Triangle
\/ Finger for PGP 2.3a Public Key <=> Expeditionary Force -- 1993-1951
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
(GEEK CODE 1.0.1) GSS d- -p+(---) c++(++++) l++ u++ e+/* m++(*)@ s-/++
n-(---) h+(*) f+ g+ w++ t++ r++ y+(*)