Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: "James J. Johannesson" <johann@******.USASK.CA>
Subject: Re: ADMIN: Next time
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 1994 16:02:39 -0600
On Sun, 13 Mar 1994, Robert A. Hayden wrote:

> I don't think we have enough new rules for another ShadowLore-type tome.
> So here are some thoughts:
>
> NERPS: Atlas
> A collection of different cities from around the world.
> Writeups would probably be on par with the Pueblo
> article from NAGEE:4. To do this, people would register
> saying that they are going to do a certain town, and
> will then be expected to do that. I know I'd like to
> do Duluth, and maybe Minneapolis/St. Paul and Mankato.


This is my first post to the list, and I haven't been playing SR for that
long, but I like the Atlas idea... I like the idea of my PC's to travel
instead of being stuck in one place.

I would like to work on the the Saskatchewan Canada area... I wouldn't
call this a city, more like an area to work on...

My thoughts on this are that since its now part of the Ameri-Indian's
area.. I could give more detail to different areas with an emphasis on the
tribal culture... since we have Wanuskewin (an native world heritage site
with a huge "medicine wheel" ... really :-) :-) I am sure I could come up
with alot of neat stuff about the area... (maybe even include a few things
about Louis Riel and his rebellion, etc., some corp stuff with the things
like Uranium and diamond mining in the north... hmmm.. .the mind
wanders... :-) I haven't read the American Nations Volumes yet, but those
are going to be my next purchases, so, put me down for this... I guess I
wonder if this is a valid type of thing we want in the Atlas though? I was
just wonder what people thought...

Later...
James

James Johannesson | University of Saskatchewan
Programmer/Analyst (Systems) | Saskatoon, Saskatchewan
Registrar's Office | CANADA (brrrrrrrr :-)
Internet: johann@******.usask.ca |

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.