Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: "S. Keith Graham" <vapspcx@***.GATECH.EDU>
Subject: Re: resubmission: mind over body
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 1994 22:36:43 -0500
>From owner-nerps%HEARN.BITNET@******.GATECH.EDU Sun Nov 20 20:03:46 1994
>Received: from gitvm1.gatech.edu by cad.gatech.edu with SMTP id AA07464
> (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for <vapspcx@***.GATECH.EDU>); Sun, 20 Nov 1994 20:03:45
-0500
>Message-Id: <199411210103.AA07464@***.gatech.edu>
>Received: from GITVM1.BITNET by GITVM1.GATECH.EDU (IBM VM SMTP V2R2)
> with BSMTP id 4050; Sun, 20 Nov 94 20:03:39 EST
>Received: from UGA.CC.UGA.EDU by GITVM1.BITNET (Mailer R2.08) with BSMTP id
> 8028; Sun, 20 Nov 94 20:03:39 EST
>Received: from UGA.CC.UGA.EDU (NJE origin LISTSERV@***) by UGA.CC.UGA.EDU
> (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 9300; Sun, 20 Nov 1994 20:04:46 -0500
>Date: Sun, 20 Nov 1994 19:03:35 -0600
>Reply-To: Net Enhancements for Role Playing Shadowrn <NERPS@*****.BITNET>
>Sender: Net Enhancements for Role Playing Shadowrn <NERPS@*****.BITNET>
>Comments: RFC822 error: <W> FROM field duplicated. Last occurrence was
> retained.
>From: Tim Skirvin <tskirvin@***.UIUC.EDU>
>Subject: Re: resubmission: mind over body
>Comments: To: Net Enhancements for Role Playing Shadowrn
> <NERPS%HEARN.bitnet@***.cso.uiuc.edu>
>To: Multiple recipients of list NERPS <NERPS@*****.BITNET>
>In-Reply-To: "Robert A. Hayden" <hayden@*******.MANKATO.MSUS.EDU>
"Re:
> resubmission: mind over body" (Nov 20, 11:56am)
>Status: R

>> A) Meta-abilities do not have levels.

> This one could. In some way.

If you have a fundamental problem with meta-abilities having levels,
just call it an "advanced PSI ability", which has levels like any
other PSI ability, but has pre-reqs, and requires an initial expenditure
of Karma and time to gain a given initial level.

Keith Graham
vapspcx@***.gatech.edu

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.