Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: "Robert A. Hayden" <hayden@*******.MANKATO.MSUS.EDU>
Subject: RESUBMISSION: Wild PSIONICS
Date: Sun, 5 Feb 1995 15:59:35 -0600
Psionics
Wild Psionics
H-01
--------
During character creation, a player may elect to become a "wild
psionicist" by taking a rating of "C" in PSI. In many ways, a Wild is
identical to a Psionic Adept (rating "B"), but represents a person that
has received little or no training in the psionic arts.

When created, a wild psi gets a rating of 2 in the dicipline of their
choice. They DO NOT get any force points to purchase powers. Wild
psionicists DO get a standard Psionic and Psionic Hacking pool.

At the beginning, a wild psi can do little more than hack a force 1
ability. As the character builds karma, though, they are able to increase
their dicipline rating, initiate, and learn meta-abilities using the
standard advancement rules. However, like an Adept, Wilds are limited to
learning only one dicipline. Over time and many adventures, a Wild can
become just as powerful as an Adept. The creation difference really only
reflects how much pre-creation training the character has received.

Cinematically, one could represent the Wild Psi as a person that just
started developing their ability. On a whim, they can hack up something
that seems weird (albiet weak) then start studying this new ability to
advance later. There are a myrid of role-playing opportunities
surrounding a recently "expressed" psionicist.



____ Robert A. Hayden <=> hayden@*******.mankato.msus.edu
\ /__ -=-=-=-=- <=> -=-=-=-=-
\/ / Finger for Geek Code Info <=> I am Pentium of Borg
\/ Finger for PGP Public Key <=> you will be approximated

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.