From:	Gurth <gurth@******.NL>
Subject:	Re: Dragon history... or not
Date:	Mon, 27 Mar 1995 11:39:50 +0200

>Could be.... could be..... but then, didn't the Genedocs in Paranormals/NA
>comment that there was no fossil record? Yeah, they could have been talking
>about just bone structure, but I get the feeling that they've pulled the
>'Jurrasic Park' thing, taking fossils and such and 'constructing' genes
>out of them. We may still be searching for 'Predraco amandae'.

Notice that I wrote "no dragon skeletons have been found." With that, I mean
no skeletons that are obviously dragons -- if they _did_ evolve from
dinosaurs (as the Dr. seems to think) skeletons from certain dinosaurs are
the fossil record of early dragons. Which ones I don't know, as I'm not an
expert on these matters. Our best bet would be to find a dino skeleton that
looks like either an eastern or a western dragon, and name that as one of
the possible ancestors -- like I did with the mosasaur. I got the idea for
this article when I watched a documentary about ancient sea creatures on
Discovery...
And I'm still working on integrating six-limbed creatures into the article...


Gurth@******.nl - Gurth@***.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/index.html
There's no vestige of a beginning, no prospect of an end
Geek Code v2.1: GS/AT/! -d+ H s:- !g p?(3) !au a>? w+(+++) v*(---) C+(++) U
P? !L !3 E? N++ K- W+ -po+(po) Y+ t(+) 5 !j R+(++)>+++$ tv+(++) b+@ D+(++)
B? e+ u+@ h! f--(?) !r(--)(*) n---->!n y? Unofficial Shadowrun Guru :)