Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: david christopher stephens <tfn5150@*******.TLH.FL.US>
Subject: Re: 2000 Leagues V1.2
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 1996 10:44:26 -0500
Everyone I now has gone away,
Died or left or forgot to stay
Sometimes took for granted
Sometimes turned away
Sometimes didn't say what i meant to say
Garbage (dog new tricks)

On Mon, 4 Nov 1996, Mark Steedman wrote:

> David Buehrer writes
>
> > [snip: 521 lines]

< > in reference to your question about raising the base
> > damage of underwater explosions - the base damage would not
> > increase, but the area of effect would go way up.
> > Unfortunately I don't know what the math is for this.
> >
> I have seen double used, probably not all that accurate the source
> was not technical but written by someone that knows more than me.
> Anyway it would be easy to implement, change grenades to -1/m and
> -1/ per 2m anything else would make the maths complex.
>
> > -David
> >
> Mark
>
hrmmmm....the damage is impact so ballistic armor is no good (yes my char
does have an armored wetsuit 2/1 if your interested) but the effect on
cyber ears should ne horrendous even with select sound filters.the
electronics of a cyberear are verry sensitive and dont like sudden and
catastrophic pressure changes (like busting yor ear drums) this is the
formula i use it's my own so if you dont like it dont use it
epicenter out to 10 meters = normal dmg
11 m to 20 m -1 staging -1 power level
and so on and so on it really depends on what
kind of campagin you run but i find ti works in a pinch also the only ppl
that take dmg from shrapnel are those within 10 meters and that is reduced
-1 dmg (if you use the condition monitor) for every meter away
outside 10m the srapnel has o damaging velocity
if any of you haver a better way tell me i made tis up on the fly
also any ideas on custom programs for a cyber deck will be plagerised
shamelessly
splatter (street sam)

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.