Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Tim Cooper <tpcooper@***.CSUPOMONA.EDU>
Subject: Re: Underwater breathing
Date: Sat, 30 Nov 1996 18:04:27 -0800
On Sat, 30 Nov 1996, Glenn Robertson wrote:

> >
> > The other problem is the gas mixture. From memory (and name) the O2 gas
> > tank is pure O2.
> No, it doesn't have to be. You can put any mix you want in there. At
> the hospital we have varying mixes. Mostly pure oxygen tanks, granted,
> but we have two different heliox varieties, various mixes of regular air
> and anesthetic, and for machinery even tanks with oxygen, carbon dioxide,
> and nitrogen. So, you can put any gas mix you like in a tank.
>
>
> > This has serious ramifications if we were to reinflate
> > with just O2. Hence, a better "air" mixture is needed. If reinflating
at
> > sea level, then an air mixture can be used. If in an underwater city or
> > something, then the pressure would require another mixture, to compensate
> > for the partial pressure of O2. So a helium/oxygen mix could be used.
>
> There is nothing wrong with using pure oxygen in tanks as I recall, unless
> you are an infant whereby you can get Retrolental Fibroplasia (RLF) and go
> blind like Stevie Wonder. Afterall, many patients at the hospital get
> pure 100% oxygen. Also, some patients on ventilators get 100% oxygen,
> which is important because they don't get any outside air entrainment.
> Oxygen doesn't cause alveolar collapse.
>
> Just my respiratory two cents.
>
> Glenn
>

I'm not sure if this applies, as I've not been following the thread too
closely, but I thought that a conventional "air" mix becomes quite lethal
at very high pressure...something about the oxygen concentrations and
pressure - net result is severe damage to the lungs. Thats why they
routinely use a mix with helium for extreme depth excursions. (Please
correct if I'm wrong, I'll try to remember where I read that..)

~Tim

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.