Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: "Gurth" <gurth@******.nl>
Subject: Re: Reawakening an old idea
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 1996 11:17:09 +0100
(I should get unsubscribed aganst my will more often -- I'm not here for
ten days max and things seem to start moving again. Or is saying this
tempting fate? :)

GKoth2258@***.com said on 15 Apr 96...

> First of all, FASA knows these lists are here. Second, they don't monitor
> them. Third, they could care less what we do, as long as we tag that
> requisite disclaimer in front of everything.

Nobody's kicked down my door yet *crosses fingers :)*

> And doing a Guide to the World would be a huge project. Way too huge. Be
> far better off selecting a piece of the world and writing it up, like maybe
> Western Europe or something (what are those damn frogs, I mean Frenchmen,
> doing?).

The world would be too big a place to write a book about, yes. Western
Europe might be a better bet, seeing that there is supposed to be an
Australia sourcebook out next year but no more European books are planned
(AFAIK).

> I still think we should finish up the old projects first though. Or at least
> think of a way to integrate them with newer ideas.

With this the main problem is that there's maybe a quarter of a book in
the stuff we currently have for Underworld. We should try to fit it in
with whatever next project we intend to do -- suggestions welcomed :)

--
Gurth@******.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/index.html
But I can pretend...
-> NERPS Project Leader & Unofficial Shadowrun Guru <-
-> The Character Mortuary: http://huizen.dds.nl/~mortuary/mortuary.html <-

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version 3.1:
GAT/! d-(dpu) s:- !a>? C+(++)@ U P L E? W(++) N o? K- w+ O V? PS+ PE
Y PGP- t(+) 5+ X++ R+++>$ tv+(++) b+@ DI? D+ G(++) e h! !r(---) y?
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.