Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: "Gurth" <gurth@******.nl>
Subject: Re: Stuff
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 1996 11:41:37 +0100
GKoth2258@***.com said on 17 Apr 96...

> Got unsubscribed yourself, eh Gurth? You know, you are one of the few people
> left that actually remembers me as "the Whistler..."

LOL! Elle is right, I *am* old... :) (Maybe I should mention that I
thought about putting down list.member.grumpy, but settled on Whistler :)

> What exactly do we have for Underworld? Why don't we review what we have,
> then we can toss around ideas as to how to finish it up. Or how to make it a
> "chapter" in another project.

That's what I thought too. I'll re-post everything I have for Underworld
at the moment, so everybody can see what there is.

> These cities would have to be of interest to shadowrunners, obviously.
> Cities like Singapore or Hong Kong (financial havens after all), maybe
> somewhere in India, maybe Seoul, Korea, or Bejing, China. Maybe Egypt (which
> I would claim now for my own writing turf), perhaps Italy (Paolo would be the
> MAN for that). Hell, maybe even that haven of frogs, Paris.

Do we have any French people on the list? Anyway, I once did a write-up of
the Netherlands with the intention of sending it to the NAGEE. A year
later I revised it, with the same intention, but I never sent it in. I
might do a third revision and make it a NERPS submission. It's 20 or more
pages, I believe, so maybe I'll have to chop some things out of it...

> Or hell, if we wanted to, we could do write-ups for places like Phoenix,
> Arizona (now a part of Pueblo) and other such places that we would actually
> know a great deal about, but yet haven't been written about.

Didn't someone already do a Phoenix thing, in one of the NAGEEs?

BTW, there's one thing I want to make clear: I like to keep things
consistent with material that's already been published. Of course, with
net.publications that's never 100% possible, but I don't think it's a good
idea to do a write-up of *any* place that's already been covered in
reasonable depth somewhere else. So no Los Angeles (NAGEE1), Las Vegas
(also NAGEE1), North Bay (NAGEE2), Chambana IL (NAGEE3), and so on.

> As far as a Russia sourcebook, it's something I've thought long and hard
> about. Potential problem. Russia is an integral part of the SR history (the
> Eurowars and all). Getting around that could be a problem. Not to mention I
> really don't think we should go heavy, at all, on ANY Earthdawn connections.
> Dropping hints is as far as we should go with that.

My idea too. ED connections might be nice, but they should be kept vague,
like the news article in the back of the adventure A Killing Glare (what,
you didn't notice that? :)

> Second potential
> problem. The Russia of NERPS would have to be largely one person's vision.
> In order for all the seperate and disparate authors to be writing for the
> same country, it would have to be decided what Russia is. How it got there.
> In other words, a basic history that the entire list would have to agree on.
> Just that might be difficult.

Plus it would have to be written by someone who understands Russia and
knows a good deal about it. Someone who lives (or has lived) there would
be best, but I think we'll have a hard time finding any of those on this
list. (If there is someone fitting that description, don't hesitate to
speak up, however.)

--
Gurth@******.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/index.html
Maybe I'm all messed up. But this is the only time I really feel alive.
-> NERPS Project Leader & Unofficial Shadowrun Guru <-
-> The Character Mortuary: http://huizen.dds.nl/~mortuary/mortuary.html <-

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version 3.1:
GAT/! d-(dpu) s:- !a>? C+(++)@ U P L E? W(++) N o? K- w+ O V? PS+ PE
Y PGP- t(+) 5+ X++ R+++>$ tv+(++) b+@ DI? D+ G(++) e h! !r(---) y?
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.