Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: dhinkley@***.org
Subject: Re: Ideas, ideas, ideas...
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 1996 23:48:43 -0700 (PDT)
On Tue, 2 Jul 1996, "Gurth" <gurth@******.nl> wrote:
>Maybe not so many, but for those who'd like to write something for
>Underworld but have no ideas what about, here are some ideas:
>
[Snip]
>* Street weapons: not everybody has access to mil-spec weaponry, so what
> /do/ they use?
[Snip]
>* Archetypes/Contacts: anybody want to create a few archetypes? Characters
> and locations are both welcome.
[Snip]
>If ay of these seem like something you want to write about, by all means
>go ahead! If you don't like any of these subjects, think of somethign you
>do want to write about and also go ahead!
>
>Anyone who is (supposed to be :) working on an article, try to finish it
>as soon as you can and post it on the list, else the book will get done
>without it.

I think all the submissions I have promised to date are in....or least I hope so
:) I have an idea for an article on street weapons. And a partly writen one on
mythical contacts, that is ones that have become urban myths in Seattle with
some GM info those that the GM wants to be real. The question is what is the
current deadline for this NERPS project and what is the subject with the next
book? I may have some time to do one or the other, but I don't want to
re-schedule and rush things only to be a day late with the article, on the
otherhand I would also not like to have the project delayed waiting for my
submission...my ego is not that large....yet. :)

David Hinkley
dhinkley@***.org

>Remember that there will be no NERPS books unless there i input from the
>list...
>

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.