Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: "Paolo Falco the FoxMaster" <Falco@****.it>
Subject: Re: The Logo Votes Results!
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 1996 13:10:24 +0200
On 14 Jul 96, Gurth wrote:

> After an exciting round of voting over the past few days, one
> logo has been chosen as the official NERPS logo proposal, by a
> vast majority of votes!

And exciting it was! I and Gurth had to hold back with cattle
prods the crowd wanting to vote, and had to open tons of cases
of letters and emails. My HP registered more than 3 million
presences due to the vote! :)

> With a lead in the order of 3:1, or 75%, the logo designed by
> Paolo Marcucci was chosen to represent the NERPS mailing
> list and its publications in the future.

I PROTEST!!! The voting was unfair! I will make an appeal to
the Court Of Constituational Rights and General Useless
Complaints!!! After all I did! (waaah!) :)
(actually, I was one of the three voting for him!)

> Slight modifications will have to be made to it

Like making it look like _my_ logo?

Seriously: since the voting is over, I can now safely delete the
other logos, and leave only the winner. Paolo (1) Marcucci's
logo can be still found at

http://www.geocities.com/SoHo/2717

I will leave the other ones for a week and then *whacko!*, so if
you really want to save them to you HD, you have one week to do
it! :)

And no, the rest of the page will suffer no modifications. :)

------------------------------------------------------------------
Paolo Falco | "I closed my shop and you brought only ONE
Ironbound Section | ball?" (from "Clerks" - and My Experience)
------------------------------------------------------------------
Skater's Site And Generally Paradoxal Poetry Page With Lemmings at
http://www.geocities.com/SoHo/2717
------------------------------------------------------------------

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.