Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Hairy Smurf <ab130f92@*******.ADELPHI.EDU>
Subject: Re: RE> China
Date: Tue, 6 May 1997 20:53:41 -0400
At 08:18 5/7/97 +1000, Lady Jestyr wrote:
>> Problem. All the other sourcebooks and novels that mention
>> China say that it has fractured and become chaotic. But the
>> Denver books contradict that. So what's up?
>
>I hate to do it but I can't help agreeing with the Denver book. China
>has a looooong history of nation-ness (is that a word? *grin*) and I
>can't see that going down the tubes in 60 years. Not even with magic
>around.


Wher did you get your history from? Even though China's had long-lasting
dynasties it's always been based on a feudal society. Same with Europe. Now
if Europe can splinter then so can China. Despite its "unified front" China
is full of different cultures and beliefs. Try this. With the magic
resurgence the tibetan monks became power houses. They took control of tibet
back, of course non-violently (probably just appeared in a puff of smoke and
said boo). That started a chain reaction the caused the local hotheads to
proclaim independence and become "warlords". All plausable, espescially in a
communist country, just look at what happened to the USSR. Its just a
byegone boogie man.


Sasquatch

---------------------------------------------------------------------
| |
| The word "spine" is, of course, an anagram of "penis". This is |
| true in almost fifty percent of the languages of the Galaxy, |
| and many people have attempted to explain why. Usually these |
| explanations get bogged down in silly puns about "standing erect".|
| -- Douglas Adams, "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" |
| |
| ab130f92@*******.adelphi.edu |
| tech@*******.adelphi.edu blair@*****.adelphi.edu |
| No Website (No time to make one) |
---------------------------------------------------------------------

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.