From:	Pete Wilson <piatro@**********.COM>
Subject:	Re: [Stuff] Pocket Secretaries (first draft)
Date:	Tue, 29 Sep 1998 22:40:45 -0500

Patrick Goodman responded:

>>(>) The Pueblo systems are sweet. They are an extension of the cybercomm
>>link technology [ct.20] that a lot of sammies I know use.
>>(>) Igni
>
>(>) Yeah, but is it backward compatible? Can I use the cybercomm implants I
>already have with the sec? I don't really need the communication side of
>the unit, but the ability to check my appointment book without having to
>pull the thing out of my pocket if my hands are full intrigues me.
>(>) Texas 2-Step
> El Paso: Never surrender. Never forget. Never forgive.
>
>>These systems require that the device be plugged into a datajack to
>>function, and commands must be ``thought out loud'' to be understood by the
>>device.
>
>(>) I guess not.
>(>) Texas 2-Step
> El Paso: Never surrender. Never forget. Never forgive.
>


(>) Another similar question. Can you access any of these comps remotely?
If you forget the sec on the hall table at home can you call it on it's
built in comm unit and retrieve/drop information into it? Any pocket sec
with this capability should be able to be checked with a cybercomm as long
as there isn't a lot of interference.
(>) Chaos Engeneer