Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: "Mark A. Imbriaco" <mark@******.net>
Subject: ADMIN: Ping Again.
Date: Thu, 2 May 1996 10:58:23 -0400 (EDT)
Last one.. I hope.

-mark
Message no. 2
From: mbroadwa@*******.glenayre.com (Mike Broadwater)
Subject: Re: ADMIN: Ping Again.
Date: Thu, 2 May 1996 10:21:57 -0500
YES! Finally some mail from this list! Thanks Mark.

Mike Broadwater
http://www.olemiss.edu/~neon
"Madness takes it's toll. Please have exact change."
Message no. 3
From: Craigtw1@***.com
Subject: Re: ADMIN: Ping Again.
Date: Thu, 2 May 1996 17:33:53 -0400
I'm getting bits and pieces of mail from TK and Plot-D. It's hard to
understand things when you don't even get the original posts.
Tom
Message no. 4
From: "Mark A. Imbriaco" <mark@******.net>
Subject: Re: ADMIN: Ping Again.
Date: Fri, 3 May 1996 11:07:28 -0400 (EDT)
> I'm getting bits and pieces of mail from TK and Plot-D. It's hard to
> understand things when you don't even get the original posts.
> Tom

Is anyone else seeing things like this? I'm inclined to say
that it's a problem with AOL, but if anyone else has any ideas,
I'd like to hear 'em..

-mark
Message no. 5
From: "Randy Nickel (General)" <a-randyn@*********.com>
Subject: RE: ADMIN: Ping Again.
Date: Fri, 3 May 1996 08:16:07 -0700
> I'm getting bits and pieces of mail from TK and Plot-D. It's hard to
> understand things when you don't even get the original posts.
> Tom

Is anyone else seeing things like this? I'm inclined to say
that it's a problem with AOL, but if anyone else has any ideas,
I'd like to hear 'em..

-mark


Nope. I seem to be getting everything and I am doing a lot of posting
so everything seems in order.

Randy

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about ADMIN: Ping Again., you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.